Subjective Well-Being: Measuring Happiness, Suffering, and Other Dimensions of Experience

By Panel on Measuring Subjective Well-Being in aPolicy-Rele Framework, Division on Behavioral, Arthur A. Stone, C. Mackie. 2014

355 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/010144286cb8e3b95e779987cee8a6f9932a9459

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Milena Nikolova
2. Xin Zhang
3. Carol Graham
4. Xi Chen
5. Xiaobo Zhang
6. John Knight
7. Andrew E. Clark
8. Richard A. Easterlin

Citations in the corpus

• Happiness in the Air: How Does a Dirty Sky Affect Mental Health and Subjective Well-being? (2017, background): “Compared to life satisfaction, CES-D scores and hedonic unhappiness are more directly related to the environment and people’s affective state in day-to-day and moment-to-moment life (Stone and Mackie 2014).10 2.2.”
• Bentham or Aristotle in the Development Process? An Empirical Investigation of Capabilities and Subjective Well-Being (2015, background): “It is important to distinguish between positive and negative affect (Figure 1) as one is not the inverse of the other, and they track differently from evaluative well-being and from one another (Stone & Mackie, 2014).”
• The Economics of Happiness (2021, background): “…the US National Academy of Sciences have provided much guidance on what subjective well-being is and how such measures should be collected validly and reliably, not just by academics, but also by official statistics offices around the world (Durand & Smith, 2013; OECD, 2013; Stone & Mackie, 2013).”