Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity (2012, background): “…options offered at different prices and their willingness to pay is revealed indirectly through their choices (see, for example, Hanley et al., 2001; Kanninen, 2007).4 In theory, SP approaches should be applicable to a wide range of ecosystem services and can be used to measure future/predicted…”
Status Quo Effect in Choice Experiments: Empirical Evidence on Attitudes and Choice Task Complexity (2009, methodology): “A main effects design based on D-optimality was obtained using SAS macros (Kuhfeld 2005; Johnson et al. 2007).”
Choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to improve (2009, background): “However, its exclusion leads to a marginal rate of substitution between the two unlabelled choices in which the marginal price for each of the attributes is estimated by dividing the attribute coefficient by cost coefficient (Alberini et al., 2007).”
Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay (2014, background): “These, plus the inclusion of a cheap talk script, represented our best effort towards inducing respondents in our hypothetical market to provide uswith truth revealing WTP responses (DOI (Department of the Interior) (1994) as cited by Harrison (2006)).”