The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
By C. Murphy, M. Haugh, F. O'Brien. Biomaterials, 2010
1,959 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering, Urology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9ae82b5e85b67cb6a101e7cb379c5bbad376367
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomaterials
In Biomedical Engineering
In Urology
Citations in the corpus
- Recent advance in surface modification for regulating cell adhesion and behaviors (2020, background): “studied the effect of the surface pore size of polycarbonate on cell adhesion and differentiation [31].”
- Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds (2012, background): “However, pore sizes in the range of 200 to 350 μm are found to be optimum for bone tissue in-growth [79].”
- Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: Role of Porosity and Pore Size (2013, positive): “131 Hence, the 3D scaffold environment can influence cell proliferation or direct cell differentiation.”
- Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: different scaffold pore sizes—different cell effects (2016, background): “The collagen-glucosaminoglycan scaffolds with 85, 120, and 325 lm pore sizes were also investigated for the adhesion and differentiation of osteoblasts (Murphy et al. 2010).”