Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: Role of Porosity and Pore Size

By Qiu Li Loh, Cleo Choong. Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2013

2,361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e1a2375330f7a100008f28d64a7cff02f9b0ea5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomaterials

1. Tom Ben-Arye
2. S. Levenberg

In Biomedical Engineering

1. J. Gough
2. I. Sabree
3. Tom Ben-Arye
4. B. Derby
5. S. Levenberg
6. Ibrahim T. Ozbolat
7. Hemanth Gudapati
8. Madhuri Dey

Citations in the corpus

• Tissue Engineering for Clean Meat Production (2019, background): “Reports of pore size for adipogenesis include 6–70μm for murine ESCs (Loh and Choong, 2013), 100–300μm for rat MSCs (Neubauer et al.”
• Mechanical properties of porous ceramic scaffolds: Influence of internal dimensions (2015, background): “However, later studies have shown that better osteogenesis occurs with a pore size 4300 mm [5,6].”
• Challenges and Recent Progress in Oral Drug Delivery Systems for Biopharmaceuticals (2019, background): “In addition to achieving the optimum porosity for delivering small drug molecules, another major challenge is obtaining macropores for loading large biomolecules and cells into hydrogels [149,150].”