The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions

By K. Philpott, L. Dooley, C. O'reilly, G. Lupton. 2011

512 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9846ad757a5a23602a922c172efef09574ed231

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change - Key strategic challenges (2019, background): “However, there is still little evidence about strategies for managing conflicts, opportunistic behaviours and constraints for adopting a dual way of acting as both an academic and an entrepreneurial organization (Philpott et al. 2011; Gianiodis et al. 2016).”
Founding team composition and early performance of university—Based spin-off companies (2014, background): “…towards surrogate entrepreneurs, developmental model, equity investments, effectiveness of technology transfer offices, (e.g., Ambos et al., 2008; Philpott et al., 2011; Siegel et al., Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage:…”
Entrepreneurship and the determinants of firm survival within regions: human capital, growth motivation and locational conditions (2017, unknown): “The evidence presented here suggests that although there is evidence of complementarities between traditional and entrepreneurial education missions (Philpott et al. 2011; van Looy et al. 2011), educational reform of some kind is needed or alternatively an acknowledgment that a different type and…”
The emerging role of university spin-off companies in developing regional entrepreneurial university ecosystems: The case of Andalusia (2019, background): “USOs are for-profit firms based on university research (Philpott et al., 2011) and they are the mechanism most used by universities to exploit the new knowledge generated from their research (Grimaldi et al.”
Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university's structural configuration on third mission performance (2019, background): “This model distinguishes ‘soft’ activities (advisory roles, consultancy, industry training, production of highly qualified graduates), closer to the traditional academic paradigm, from ‘hard’ initiatives such as patenting, licensing and spin-off activities (Philpott et al., 2011) as part of their th”
Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature (2018, background): “…integrative initiatives are not only more effective, but also more closely aligned with the decentralized nature of science (Carayannis et al. 2016; Debackere and Veugelers 2005; Hayter 2016b; Henrekson and Rosenberg 2001; Philpott et al. 2011; Ras-mussen and Borch 2010; Todorovic et al. 2011).”
The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria (2015, background): “, 2000) has been criticized for neglecting contextual specificities and lack of direct applicability to European countries with a tradition of the Humboldtian university model (Philpott et al., 2011).”