Feeding farmed salmon: Is organic better?
By Nathan Pelletier, P. Tyedmers. 2007
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f98370770f3c277d01db530b97135acfd72cca49
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Searching for Solutions in Aquaculture: Charting a Sustainable Course (2012, unknown): “For example, the production of terrestrial A cce ss p r i d e by nutrient and chemical input use and loss, land clearing in sensitive environments such as Amazon, high energy-dependency ratios, and greenhouse gas emissions (144, 145).”
- Environmental impacts of genetic improvement of growth rate and feed conversion ratio in fish farming under rearing density and nitrogen output limitations (2016, background): “Several studies have investigated the potential of alternative feed 9 compositions (Boissy et al., 2011; Papatryphon et al., 2004; Pelletier and Tyedmers, 2007) or 10 alternative rearing systems (Aubin et al., 2009; Ayer and Tyedmers, 2009; d’Orbcastel et al., 11 2009) to reduce the environmental…”
- Energy Intensity of Agriculture and Food Systems (2011, background): “Agricultural inputs tend to have lower energy demands than marine- or livestockderived inputs; hence, lower trophic-level feeds may reduce energy intensity (83).”
- The Carbon Footprint of Norwegian Seafood Products on the Global Seafood Market (2013, background): “Due to the general finding that crop-based feed inputs are less climate-intensive than animalderived inputs (Pelletier and Tyedmers 2007)—a finding that was confirmed—the proportion of marine inputs in the feed is a key factor for future improvement.”