Multinational Companies, Technology Spillovers and Plant Survival

By Holger Görg, Eric Strobl. 2016

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f95c28c27f6751ba888f8a2e875eafd2072074ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Love
2. S. Roper
3. Jun Du
4. P. Ganotakis
5. Quan Li
6. Mark Freel
7. Nola Hewitt-Dundas
8. M. A. Mansury

In Strategy and Management

1. S. Roper
2. J. Love
3. Jun Du
4. Quan Li
5. P. Ganotakis
6. Nigel Driffield
7. Mark Freel
8. Sonal S. Pandya

Citations in the corpus

• Democracy, Autocracy, and Tax Incentives to Foreign Direct Investors: A Cross-National Analysis (2006, background): “On the other hand, because MNCs are more productive and competitive, they threaten rival host firms (e.g., Aitken and Harrison 1999; Gorg and Strobl 2003).”
• Multinationals and Plant Exit: Evidence from Chile (2005, unknown): “The data show that between 1990 and 1995 foreign multinationals have a statistically significantly lower exit rate than domestic plants; a result that is in line with Görg and Strobl (2003a,b) and Bernard and Sjöholm (2003) who both find that in a simple comparison of unconditional exit rates, plant”
• Innovation, ownership and profitability (2009, background): “A substantial body of academic research has recognized and documented the contribution of multinational firms to the Irish economy (e.g. Barry and Bradley, 1997; Love and Roper, 2001; Görg and Strobl, 2002, 2003; Girma et al., 2004; Cassidy et al., 2005).”
• Much Ado About Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? (2004, unknown): “…of which is for developing countries: Liu, Siler, Wang and Wei (2000) and Haskel, Pereira and Slaughter (2002) for the UK, Castellani and Zanfei (2002) for Italy, Keller and Yeaple (2003) for the US, Ruane and Ugur (2002), Görg and Strobl (2003) for Ireland and Damijan et al. (2001) for Romania.”
• Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders? New evidence ☆ (2008, unknown): “…limited to country studies (e.g. Blomström, 1986; Kokko, 1994) and micro-econometric analyses (e.g. Aitken and Harrison, 1999; Javorcik, 2004; Görg and Strobl, 2003).1 To the best of our knowledge, the only panel country study analysing the role of FDI in international knowledge diffusion is…”
• Do Chinese Domestic Firms Benefit from FDI Inflow? Evidence of Horizontal and Vertical Spillovers (2009, unknown): “Other studies that find negative spillovers include Haddad and Harrison (1993) for Morocco, Djankov and Hoekman (2000) for the Czech Republic, Konings (2001) for Bulgaria, Romania, and Poland, and Javorcik (2004) for Lithuania.”