Representative Trust and Reciprocity: Prevalence and Determinants
By Thomas J. Dohmen, Armin Falk, David Huffman, Uwe Sunde. 2008
244 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f95bdeff9467f0f85d939e124fa7ca71ef2f3842
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Armin Falk
- Thomas J. Dohmen
- Stephan Meier
- David Huffman
- Uwe Sunde
- Christian Zehnder
- Anke Becker
- Marco Caliendo
In Safety Research
- Armin Falk
- Thomas J. Dohmen
- Anke Becker
- Uwe Sunde
- David Huffman
- Fabian Kosse
- Thomas Deckers
- Stephan Meier
In Sociology and Political Science
- Thomas J. Dohmen
- Armin Falk
- David Huffman
- Anke Becker
- Marco Caliendo
- Frank M. Fossen
- A. Kritikos
- Uwe Sunde
Citations in the corpus
- Personality traits and the propensity to trust friends and strangers (2016, unknown): “In contrast to Mondak and Halperin (2008), Anderson (2010), and Dohmen et al. (2008), we find that in addition to agreeableness, openness and conscientiousness also matter for trust in strangers.”
- The Intergenerational Transmission of Risk and Trust Attitudes (2012, unknown): “Figure 1 also shows that mothers are less willing to take risks than fathers, in line with the gender effect that Dohmen et al. (2011) find using the entire sample of the 2004 wave.”
- Homo Reciprocans: Survey Evidence on Behavioural Outcomes (2008, background): “In previous research, we have explored the relationship of reciprocity to exogenous individual characteristics, including age, gender, and height (Dohmen et al., 2008), as well as the relationship to another social motivation, trust.”
- The Relationship between Economic Preferences and Psychological Personality Measures (2012, methodology): “5 Dohmen et al. (2008) relate survey measures of social preferences to measures of the Big Five using data from the SOEP and find significant associations between trust, as well as positive and negative reciprocity and personality traits.”
- Do Lab Experiments Misrepresent Social Preferences? The Case of Self-Selected Student Samples (2013, result): “Our results are in line with earlier studies that also show that prosocial behavior is even more frequently observed with non-student participants (see e.g., Fehr and List 2004; Bellemare and Kröger 2007; Dohmen et al. 2008; Burks et al. 2009; Belot et al. 2010).”
- Trust, Positive Reciprocity, and Negative Reciprocity: Do These Traits Impact Entrepreneurial Dynamics? (2010, background): “11 Dohmen et al. (2008) study determinants of trust, positive, and negative reciprocity and find that women and older people tend to trust more and to be less negatively reciprocal, and more positively reciprocal (the effect of gender on positive reciprocity is not consistent across specifications, ”
- Performance Pay and Multi-Dimensional Sorting: Productivity, Preferences and Gender (2006, unknown): “Respondents in the 2004 wave also answered a survey question on their willingness to take risks that subjects in the experiment answered and that has been experimentally validated in Dohmen et al. (2009) (See section B).”
- Measures of Social Isolation (2017, methodology): “The questions on reciprocity have been borrowed from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) (2005), as outlined in Dohmen et al. (2006) and Gundelach and Traunmuller (2013). While these measures are centred on attitudes, there is experimental evidence to suggest that answers to the survey items do ”