Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame.

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impure or Just Weird? Scenario Sampling Bias Raises Questions About the Foundation of Morality (2015, background): “We also hypothesized that weirdness would uniquely influence judgments of character because of the link between counternormativity and dispositional attributions (Jones & Davis, 1965; Pizarro & Tannenbaum, 2011).”
How Quick Decisions Illuminate Moral Character (2013, background): “…in moral psychology has suggested that moving from a characterization of an action as moral or immoral to an impression of the agent’s moral character is a more nuanced process than one of simply assuming bad or good actions reflect bad or good character, respectively (Pizarro & Tannenbaum, 2011).”
Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction (2012, background): “That said, people routinely make moral attributions and character judgments based on information they have available (Birnbaum, 1973; Pizarro & Tannenbaum, 2012; Reeder & Spores, 1983), and cognitive economy requires that these judgments be imperfect and perhaps even overly simplistic at times…”