The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating.

By Mark Conner, Paul Norman, Russell Bell. Health Psychology, 2002

638 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f93a4407c0db3fa6aa12c28588d5e3f361cdc370

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Citations in the corpus

An Experimental Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior (2009, background): “The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB; Ajzen, 1991) is among the leading theories used to predict a range of health behaviors, such as physical activity (Armitage, 2005; Eng & Martin Ginis, 2007; Johnston et al., 2007), eating ( Conner, Norman, & Bell, 2002 ), and other health behaviors (Kiene, Tennen”
Temporal stability of behavioural intention as a moderator of intention–health behaviour relationships (2007, methodology): “…intention stability was predicted to simultaneously increase the predictive power of intentions and decrease the predictive power of past behaviour (Conner et al., 2000, 2002; Sheeran et al., 1999b).2 These regressions accounted for between 23 and 71% of the variance in behaviour (Table VI).”
Meta-Analysis of the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) to Understanding Health Behaviors (2016, background): “This is a limiting condition of the TRA/TPB, although intention can still predict over prolonged time intervals [123].”
Consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward consuming functional foods in Norway (2020, background): “This is congruent with previous studies (Conner et al., 2002; McEachan et al., 2011),”
Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice (2006, background): “Conner et al., 2002 ) to consume organic food during the next 2 weeks (from 0 to 14 days), coded from 0 to 14. We chose a frequency measure because it is deemed the most appropriate scale to use when the behaviour in question is repeated behaviour, as food choice is (see e.g.”
Changing the Division of Household Labor: A Negotiated Process Between Partners (2007, positive): “plans) is effective in influencing behavior, such as eating healthier, exercising, attending cancer screenings, attempting to quit smoking, and graduating high school ( Conner, Norman, & Bell, 2002; Davis, Ajzen, Saunders, & Williams, 2002; Norman, Conner, & Bell, 1999; Rise, Thompson, & Verplanken”
Anticipated emotion in consumers' intentions to select eco-friendly restaurants: Augmenting the theory of planned behavior (2013, background): “, 0–40% of the variance) explained in previous meta-analytical eviews (Armitage and Conner, 2001; Conner et al., 2002; Godin nd Kok, 1996; Sheeran and Orbell, 1999).”
Consumer attitudes and behavior: the theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions (2008, neutral): “…(Verbeke & Vackier, 2005) .21 .18 .27 .31 .21 .52 .42 Consume dairy products (Kim, Reicks, & Sjoberg, 2003) .38 .11* .30 .42 .22 .49 .39 Eat a healthy diet (Conner et al., 2002) .31 .02* .47 .43 .03* .27 .09 Notes: ATT = attitude toward the behavior, SN = subjective norm, PBC = perceived…”