Travels in hypermodality

By Jay Lemke. 2002

459 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Human-Computer Interaction, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f90df1dbd0cd5d2986d7324c1506965a02e9afef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Charles K. Kinzer
2. Julie Coiro
3. Michaela Vari
4. I. Rodríguez
5. Donald J. Leu
6. Kevin G. Barnhurst
7. Scott E. Grapin

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Michaela Vari
2. I. Rodríguez
3. Donald J. Leu
4. Kevin G. Barnhurst
5. Scott E. Grapin

In Philosophy

1. Michaela Vari
2. I. Rodríguez
3. Kevin G. Barnhurst
4. Scott E. Grapin

Citations in the corpus

• Multimodality in the New Content Standards Era: Implications for English Learners (2019, background): “In this way, multimodal communication is the “logical product, in a multiplicative sense, of the capacities of the constituent semiotic resource systems” (Lemke, 2002, p. 303).”
• Mapping Visual Studies in Communication (2004, methodology): “They trace how semiotics translates from one mode to another, develop schemes to analyze composite meanings in hypermedia, or explore how temporality permeates new media, blurring the verbal–visual distinction (e.g., Waisanen, 2002; Lemke, 2002; Rodowick, 2001).”
• New Literacies: A Dual-Level Theory of the Changing Nature of Literacy, Instruction, and Assessment (2017, background): “It can also be seen by the fact that many scholars recently have been attracted to studying this problem and have sought to describe the changes taking place (e.g., Gee, 2007c; Kress, 2003; Lankshear & Knobel, 2006; Lemke, 2002; New London Group, 1996; Street, 1995, 2003).”