Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where

By Natalie Sebanz, Günther Knoblich. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2009

552 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7ddf084c20c6495ddbb6c87058980f324a376e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

What is Shared in Joint Action? Issues of Co-representation, Response Conflict, and Agent Identification (2011, background): “The main function attributed to task co-representation and vicarious response activation seems to be that actors can predict their co-actor's action and action effects (e.g., Sebanz et al. 2006; Sebanz and Knoblich 2009; Vesper et al. 2010).”
Music and communication in music psychology (2014, background): “…and neural processes involved in social interaction begun to emerge, identifying phenomena such as action simulation and mental state attribution (Sebanz & Knoblich, 2009), postural and gaze coordination (Shockley, Richardson & Dale, 2009), action prediction (Vesper, van der Wel, Knoblich, &…”
Understanding interpersonal action coordination: an fMRI study (2011, background): “Attention has recently been focused on joint actions in which two or more individuals coordinate their actions (Bekkering et al. 2009; Knoblich and Sebanz 2006, 2008; Newman-Norlund et al. 2007a; Sebanz and Knoblich 2009; Sebanz et al. 2006).”
Toward You (2010, background): “In cooperative contexts, this process would allow individuals to adjust the timing of their actions as to achieve a common outcome in real time (Sebanz & Knoblich, 2009).”
Does synchrony promote generalized prosociality? (2014, methodology): “After the two group activities were performed*involving either (i) synchronous movement or (ii) puzzle completion*participants were invited to play a simplified version of Tajfel’s (2010) group-level game, which was originally devised to examine out-group prosociality.”
Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data (2011, background): “These processes are often referred to as action simulation (Sebanz & Knoblich, 2009) because they use internal models guiding an agent’s own actions to predict other agents’ actions in real time (Wolpert, Doya, & Kawato, 2003).”
Language as a Tool for Interacting Minds (2010, background): “In order to achieve smooth action coordination and timing, it is not sufficient to perceive and understand what the other is doing, we must also be able to make predictions about what she will do next (Frith and Frith, 2006; Sebanz and Knoblich, 2009).”
Interactive Team Cognition (2013, background): “…collective behavior and joint action that focuses on groups of relatively independent members (Goldstone & Gureckis, 2009) or tasks that tap a common coding for simple cognitive or motor skills across people (e.g., Knoblich & Jordan, 2003; Sebanz & Knoblich, 2009; Sebanz, Knoblich, & Prinz, 2003).”
Communicative Interactions Improve Visual Detection of Biological Motion (2011, background): “. Time places serious constraints on joint actions and, as the time windows for coordination are often very narrow, actors must achieve a close temporal coordination for acting synchronously or in turns”
Belief-based action prediction in preverbal infants (2014, background): “For humans especially, action prediction likely plays an important role in facilitating cooperation and collaboration (Sebanz & Knoblich, 2009).”
The Phenomenology of Joint Action: Self-Agency vs. Joint-Agency (2012, background): “…have recently started investigating the abilities needed for successful online coordination and the cognitive and neural processes underlying these abilities (Bekkering et al., 2009; Knoblich & Sebanz, 2008; Newman-Norlund et al., 2007a; Sebanz et al., 2006a; Sebanz & Knoblich, 2009).”
Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eye- movements are modulated by reading ability - Evidence from Indian low and high literates (2012, background): “People predict the outcome of others' actions as they unfold (Sebanz & Knoblich, 2009), ensemble musicians generate online predictions by simulating the concurrent productions of their co-musicians (Keller & Koch, 2008; Wolpert, Doya, & Kawato, 2003), and knowing a co-actor's task influences one's…”
Measuring the Dynamics of Interactional Synchrony (2012, unknown): “…to predict or anticipate each other’s actions that may facilitate (or even obviate the need for) mental simulation processes proposed for this function (Sebanz and Knoblich 2009) which have been hypothesized by some to be instantiated in the mirror systems of the brain (Newman-Norlund et al. 2007).”
A minimal architecture for joint action (2010, unknown): “An open question is whether there are comparablemechanisms for predicting the combined outcomes of multiple agents’ actions (Keller, 2008; Sebanz & Knoblich, 2009).”
Spatiotemporal Movement Planning and Rapid Adaptation for Manual Interaction (2013, background): “During a dyadic interaction, the capacity to quickly register the intention of a teammate and react to it before his/her action sequence is completed is essential for a fluent team performance [32].”