The Phenomenology of Joint Action: Self-Agency vs. Joint-Agency

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How does it feel to act together? (2014, background): “All these issues concerning the phenomenology of joint action and the factors that may influence it have only very recently started to be addressed (Obhi & Hall, 2011; Pacherie, 2012; van der Wel, Sebanz & Knoblich, 2012; Wiess, Herwig & Schütz-Bosbach, 2011).”
The ADaptation and Anticipation Model (ADAM) of sensorimotor synchronization (2013, background): “Following seminal work by Wolpert et al. (2003), a number of approaches have proposed that such paired forward and inverse models are employed during social interaction (e.g., Pacherie, 2008, 2012).”
Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactive account of joint musical performance (2015, background): “…how deep our knowledge of muscular (or neural) activity might be, reducing participatory music-making to a behavioural achievement (see Hutto, 2011; Pacherie, 2012) will leave us with no information of what it is really like to play music together (see also Biasutti, 2013; Schögler, 1999–2000).”
Artificial cognition for social human-robot interaction: An implementation (2017, background): “…what action to execute next [2], and who should perform it, from the robot or the human (or both in case of a collaborative action such as a handover [3, 4]), how it should achieved and what signals should be sensed and / or produced by the robot to facilitate human-robot joint action [5, 6, 7, 8].”