Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents
By D. Davies. Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2003
2,685 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Molecular Medicine, Periodontics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7bf5c9d932d3c6e0eb1d1fe061a9b5a6f90e2f1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
In Molecular Medicine
In Periodontics
Citations in the corpus
- agr-Mediated Dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms (2008, background): “The challenge presented by biofilm infections is the remarkable resistance to both host immune responses and available chemotherapies [6,7], and estimates suggest that as many as 80% of chronic bacterial infections are biofilm associated [8].”
- Liquid-infused structured surfaces with exceptional anti-biofouling performance (2012, background): “For example, exposure to chlorine bleach for 60 min still leaves live cells (8); biofilms in pipes flushed continuously with multiple biocides over 7 d recolonize the pipes (15), and biofilms can survive in bottled iodine solution for up to 15 months (16).”
- Klebsiella pneumoniae: Going on the Offense with a Strong Defense (2016, background): “Bacteria within this structure often become resistant to chemicals to which planktonically grown bacteria may be susceptible (293).”
- Infection of orthopedic implants with emphasis on bacterial adhesion process and techniques used in studying bacterial-material interactions (2012, background): “Therefore, inhibiting bacterial adhesion is essential to prevent implant-associated infection, because biofilm are extremely resistant to both the immune system and antibiotics.(12,13) Therefore, to succeed in orthopedic implants, implant materials must be habitable by bone-forming cells (favoring a”
- Immobilized viable microbial cells: from the process to the proteome ... or the cart before the horse (2004, positive): “The results of PCA also cast doubts on the existence of a unique IC phenotype (Davies, 2003), however, since the nature of the substratum used for biofilm development was shown to contribute to the observed modifications in 2D electropherograms.”
- Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action (2017, background): “as a major cause of persistent nosocomial infections in immune-compromised patients.(4,5) Around 50% of the”
- Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment (2023, neutral): “…decreased penetration of the drug [141–147], the biofilm’s modified chemical microenvironment [148–152], and a subgroup of microorganisms in a biofilm that exhibit a form of differentiation similar to spore formation [153–155] all are linked to drug resistance in the biofilm colonies of bacteria [156].”
- Biofilms as Promoters of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance and Tolerance (2020, background): “Indeed, about 80% of the chronic and recurrent microbial infections in humans are caused by biofilms, some of which result in high mortality and morbidity rates [11,12], particularly those caused by MDR bacteria.”
- A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies (2010, background): “These processes allow the microorganism to survive and grow (Davies, 2003; Gilbert & McBain, 2003; Mah & O’Toole, 2001; McBain, Rickard, & Gilbert, 2002).”
- Extracellular DNA Chelates Cations and Induces Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms (2008, background): “indifference of slow-growing, nutrient-limited cells [30], and unique resistance mechanisms specifically associated with biofilms [31,32].”
- Bacterial biofilm formation on implantable devices and approaches to its treatment and prevention (2018, background): “The Medical Devices Bureau of Health Canada has recognized 4 classes of medical devices based on the level of control necessary to assure the safety and effectiveness of the device that are [95, 96]: 1.”