Water footprints of nations

By A. Chapagain, Arjen Y. Hoekstra. 2004

542 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ocean Engineering, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7b45e8817a5a82ec429c0088c88e1976ebbf077

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ocean Engineering

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Global Dimension of Water Governance: Why the River Basin Approach Is No Longer Sufficient and Why Cooperative Action at Global Level Is Needed (2010, background): “9 94 448% 1 Source: [61].”
Internal and external green-blue agricultural water footprints of nations, and related water and land savings through trade (2011, background): “As can be seen in Table A1, LPJmL-computed total VWE values compare well with those found by Chapagain and Hoekstra (2004, Appendix XIX). Oki and Kanae (2004) compute much higher values for temperate cereals and rice; one likely reason is that they assumed a constant global average crop water requir”
The water footprints of Morocco and the Netherlands: Global water use as a result of domestic consumption of agricultural commodities (2007, methodology): “agriculture was not for producing commodities for domestic consumption but for export( Chapagain and Hoekstra, 2004 ).”
National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption (2011, background): “…footprints of nations was carried out by Hoekstra and Hung (2002); a second, much more comprehensive study, was done by Hoekstra and Chapagain and reported in a number of subsequent publications: Chapagain and Hoekstra (2004, 2008), Chapagain et al. (2006) and Hoekstra and Chapagain (2007a, 2008).”
Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK (2010, background): “The water footprint has recently been promoted as an important indicator for human water consumption (Chapagain and Hoekstra, 2004; Hoekstra and Chapagain, 2007, 2008;WFN, 2008).”
Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis (2009, background): “The interest in virtual water started to grow rapidly once the first quantitative studies were published (Hoekstra and Hung, 2002; Hoekstra, 2003; Chapagain and Hoekstra, 2004; Oki and Kanae, 2004; De Fraiture et al., 2004).”
Drivers of the virtual water trade (2014, background): “Virtual water flows associated to food trade are remarkable and they have been estimated to be as large as 223 3 1012 m3/yr [Hoekstra and Hung, 2002; Chapagain and Hoekstra, 2004; De Fraiture et al., 2004; Oki and Kanae, 2004].”
The water footprint of Tunisia from an economic perspective (2015, result): “The study adds to earlier F studies for Tunisia (Chapagain and Hoekstra, 2004; Chahed t al., 2008, 2011; Mekonnen and Hoekstra, 2011a; Hoekstra and ekonnen, 2012) by putting emphasis on the analysis of the ecoomic dimension of water use.”
International trade of scarce water (2013, result): “The water footprints from our study, before the scarcity weighting step, agree with those determined in previous studies (Chapagain and Hoekstra, 2004; Feng et al., 2011), as documented in Lenzen et al. (2012a).”
Water saving through international trade of agricultural products (2005, unknown): “The average global volume of virtual water flows related to the international trade in agricultural products was 1263 Gm3/yr in the period 1997–2001 (Chapagain and Hoekstra, 2004).”