Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Internal and external green-blue agricultural water footprints of nations, and related water and land savings through trade (2011, background): “Kanae (2010)1 Hoekstra (2010)1 Hoekstra (2004)3 (2004)4 (2010) (2010) (2006)5 (2004)3 (2006)5 (2004)3 (2010)2 (2010)2”
The future of food — Scenarios and the effect on natural resource use in agriculture in 2050 (2014, methodology): “Footprint methodology (e.g. the Ecological Footprint, the Carbon Footprint, the Water Footprint and the Nitrogen Footprint) takes a life cycle approach (Galli et al., 2012; Hoekstra, 2009; Leach et al., 2012; Wackernagel et al., 2002).”
A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods (2010, neutral): “, [25-27]).”
Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family (2014, methodology): “…water, and from rain, respectively), while the grey footprints refer to the waste assimilation by water and is defined as the volume of freshwater required to assimilate the load of pollutants based on the existing ambient water quality standards (Chapagain and Hoekstra, 2008; Hoekstra, 2009).”