Unstructured youth recreation centre participation and antisocial behaviour development: Selection influences and the moderating role of antisocial peers

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Breadth and Intensity of Youth Activity Involvement as Contexts for Positive Development (2006, background): “3Department of Child and Youth Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada. provision of a variety of growth-promoting experiences (see Hansen et al., 2003; Mahoney et al., 2004a,b; Yates and Youniss, 1996).”
Exploring adolescent self-defining leisure activities and identity experiences across three countries (2005, background): “Refined analyses with respect to the characteristics of the peer network, as others have carried out, could facilitate our understanding of how expressiveness with peers yields positive or negative developmental outcomes (for example, Mahoney et al., 2004).”