Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving.

By David L. Strayer, Frank A. Drews, W. Johnston. Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 2003

1,128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5f9cd049d8181822647da00464548c40212845e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Real-Time Detection of Driver Cognitive Distraction Using Support Vector Machines (2007, methodology): “This paper presents an unobtrusive approach that uses eye movements and driving behavior to detect driver cognitive distraction.”
A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. (2008, neutral): “Naturalistic 28 Strayer et al. (2003) HF v. Base RT, Head Cell Sim.”
Regulating Conversation During Driving: A Problem for Mobile Telephones? (2005, neutral): “This theory has been suggested by many researchers (Haigney & Westerman, 2001; Harbluk, Noy, & Eizenman, 2002; Lamble et al., 1999; Strayer et al., 2003), though the only evidence for this was, until recently, anecdotal (Parkes, 1991).”
Driver distraction: A review of the literature (2003, neutral): “…7.2 DRIVING SIMULATORS..................................................................................... ...29 7.3 DUAL-TASK STUDIES .. ..................................................................................... . .…”
Driver performance effects of simultaneous visual and cognitive distraction and adaptation behavior (2012, background): “Under cognitive distraction drivers tend to increase headway distance to a lead vehicle in a car-following scenario, which requires mainly operational control (instantaneous braking and accelerating) (Strayer & Drews, 2004; Strayer et al., 2003).”
The Relation Between Smartphone Use and Everyday Inattention (2017, methodology): “Given that much prior work has focused on in-the-moment consequences of smartphone use (i.e., state-level measures, e.g., while using a driving simulator; Strayer et al., 2006; Strayer et al., 2003; Strayer & Johnston, 2001), here, we adopted an individual differences approach to investigate the rel”
Text Messaging During Simulated Driving (2009, background): “This behavior has been interpreted as an attempt by drivers to reduce the likelihood of getting into a crash (e.g., Strayer et al., 2003).”
Driver distraction : a review of the literature (2007, neutral): “Driving Task Demands The demands of the driving task itself, such as increases in traffic density and the complexity of the traffic environment, can also influence the distracting effects of engaging in non-driving tasks (Strayer et al., 2003).”
A Review of Communication, Driver Characteristics, and Controls Aspects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) (2016, background): “Thus far, little has been done to implement the human trust factor into system design.”
Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operations (2009, background): “), but may also relate to the cognitive processing while engaged in a conversation (Redelmeier & Tibshirani, 1997; Goodman et al.; Strayer & Johnston, 2001; Harbluk, Noy, & Eizenman, 2002; Strayer et al., 2003; Patten, Kircher, Östlund, & Nilsson, 2004).”