The State of SCCT Research in Relation to Social Class
By Lisa Y. Flores, Rachel L. Navarro, Saba Rasheed Ali. 2017
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Gender Studies, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5e1650e28042457360cd2a5510472e240d8a87e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Robert W. Lent
- Steven D. Brown
- Sherri L. Turner
- N. Fouad
- N. Betz
- Hung-Bin Sheu
- George Gunnesch-Luca
- Raluca Livinƫi
In Gender Studies
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- SES, Gender, and STEM Career Interests, Goals, and Actions: A Test of SCCT (2019, background): “SES, as viewed through the lens of the quality of interactions and opportunities afforded by one’s school and community, may be particularly telling, as these environments afford or deny opportunities for young people (Diemer & Ali, 2009; Flores et al., 2017).”
- Social cognitive career theory at 25: Empirical status of the interest, choice, and performance models (2019, background): “This focus on diversity has extended over time to encompass, for example, first generation college students (Garriott, Navarro, & Flores, 2017), persons from lower income backgrounds (Flores, Navarro, & Ali, 2017), underrepresented groups in science and engineering (Fouad & Santana, 2017), racial/…”
- Effects of Economic Uncertainty on Mental Health in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context: Social Identity Disturbance, Job Uncertainty and Psychological Well-Being Model (2020, background): “Limited access to work (Fabian, 2013), financial resources (Thompson et al., 2017; Smith, 2015), healthcare services and poverty (Flores et al., 2017) result in psychological, social and economic damage (Blustein et al., 2019).”
- Social Cognitive Career Theory in a Diverse World (2017, background): “For example, Flores et al. (2017) suggest that such variables as perceived classicism (e.g., encounters with classism), family income and community wealth disparities, and instructional methods used in resource-poor and resource-rich schools deserve attention as background contextual influences (e.g”