The role of energy in economic growth
By David I. Stern. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2011
659 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5de1bf77becc4e58477afd8d5cc8c298115ee66
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Pollution
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- Mantu Kumar Mahalik
- Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
- E. Tan
- S. Sorrell
- M. Bayrak
- Ömer Esen
- María del Pópulo Pablo-Romero
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- S. Sorrell
- Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
- Mantu Kumar Mahalik
- F. Krausmann
- Nanthakumar Loganathan
- Zsuzsanna Csereklyei
- María del Pópulo Pablo-Romero
Citations in the corpus
- Is There Really Granger Causality between Energy Use and Output? (2014, background): “Quality adjusted energy use should be a better measure of energy as a factor of production (Stern, 2011) but we were unable to test its effects due to a paucity of studies.”
- Energy rebound as a potential threat to a low-carbon future: findings from a new exergy-based national-level rebound approach (2017, background): “Meanwhile, Stern [8] describes how producer-sided rebound may be higher as producer responses (i.”
- Modeling international trends in energy efficiency (2012, background): “More disaggregated studies attribute a greater role to structural change and a smaller role to technological change (Stern, 2011).”
- Energy and Economic Growth: The Stylized Facts (2014, methodology): “Existing research shows that technological change within industries explains more of the decline in energy intensity globally than does broad structural change (Stern 2011, 2012; Henriques and Kander, 2010; Mulder and de Groot 2012, Voigt et al., 2014).”
- Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches (2015, background): “Establishing the relative importance of different variables is correspondingly dif fi cult, with sophisticated econometric studies providing contradictory results [15,16].”
- Implications of net energy-return-on-investment for a low-carbon energy transition (2018, background): “The total net energy delivered to society can be calculated by summing the net energy across all energy sources, as in equation (2):”
- A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: bibliometric and conceptual mapping (2020, background): “…tests (Stern 2011, Kalimeris et al 2014), more useful conclusions could be drawn from a sound theoretical understanding of energy conversion chains, their relation to economic activity and the role of efficiency gains and rebound effects (Stern 2011, Hickel and Kallis 2019, Parrique et al 2019).”
- A meta-analysis investigation of the direction of the energy-GDP causal relationship: implications for the growth-degrowth dialogue (2014, background): “The energy measurement unit is a crucial issue in the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth (Cleveland et al., 1984; Kaufmann, 1992; Warr et al., 2010; Stern, 2011).”