Change Detection Without Awareness: Do Explicit Reports Underestimate the Representation of Change in the Visual System?

By Diego Fernandez-Duque, Ian M. Thornton. 2000

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5d2df79f5404de7366df69fb10ee30c81d6e5e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. A. Hollingworth
2. Evan Thompson
3. Mary M. Hayhoe
4. J. Henderson
5. Marvin M. Chun
6. John M. Henderson
7. M. Tye
8. Alva Noë

In Sensory Systems

1. M. Tye
2. J. Henderson
3. Luiz Pessoa
4. Brian J. Scholl
5. Alva Noë
6. John M. Henderson
7. Mary M. Hayhoe
8. Marvin M. Chun

Citations in the corpus

• Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. (2003, background): “However, it is possible that the explicit tests of recognition memory used in Experiments 2 and 3 underestimated the total amount of information encoded during driving (e.g., Fernandez-Duque & Thornton, 2000; Hollingworth & Henderson, 2002; Hollingworth, Williams, & Henderson, 2001).”
• A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. (2001, background): “(1998), Fernandez-Duque and Thornton (2000), and Williams and Simons (2000). These effects raise serious doubts about the use of overt change detection as a measure of visual representation.”
• Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes (2002, methodology): “…because the explicit detection measure is not sensitive to the presence of that information, as has been amply dem- onstrated by studies such as this one, showing implicit effects of change (Fernandez-Duque & Thornton, 2000; Hayhoe et al., 1998; Hollingworth et al., 2001; Williams & Simons, 2000).”
• Vision Using Routines: A Functional Account of Vision (2000, background): “The controlling factor in search time appears, rather, to be one of the difficulty of the discrimination or quality of the signal (Geisler, 1995; Palmer, 1995).”
• Attenuated Change Blindness for Exogenously Attended Items in a Flicker Paradigm (2000, background): “sensing that there is a change, but not being able to identify or locate it), even without attention, before the change is actually seen ( Fernandez-Duque & Thornton, this issue; Rensink, 1998).”
• Nonconceptual Content, Richness, and Fineness of Grain (2006, background): “See here Henderson 1997; Hayhoe et al 1998; Fernandez-Duque and Thornton 2000; Williams and Simons 2000.”
• On the Functional Role of Implicit Visual Memory for the Adaptive Deployment of Attention Across Scenes (2000, background): “Most important, the capacity of implicit representations is much higher than that accessible to explicit retrieval operations needed for change blindness tasks (see also Fernandez-Duque & Thornton, this issue ).”
• Visual memory for natural scenes: Evidence from change detection and visual search (2006, methodology): “Finally, evidence of preserved memory in the face of change blindness is observed using measures more sensitive than explicit report of change (Fernandez-Duque & Thornton, 2000; see Thornton & Fernandez-Duque, 2002, for a review).”
• Beyond the Grand Illusion: What Change Blindness Really Teaches Us About Vision (2000, background): “This possibility deserves to be investigated further, especially in light of Hayhoe et al.’s (1998) finding that change blindness is sometimes accompanied by non-verbal behavioural correlates of awareness (see also Fernandez-Duque & Thornton, this issue ).”