Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes

By A. Hollingworth, J. Henderson. 2002

653 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93d7c4f38440efb9ca3e330e10b6c43928a73c38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Citations in the corpus

Hierarchical Mixture of Classification Experts Uncovers Interactions between Brain Regions (2009, background): “It is conceivable that the detection of typical objects (e.g., a car) helps with determining the scene category (e.g., highway), as has been shown in [ 17 , 6]. On the other hand, it is also possible that information flows the other way, that scene-specific information in PPA and RSC feeds into LOC ”
PassPoints: Design and longitudinal evaluation of a graphical password system (2005, background): “Studies of detection of changes in images also suggest that people retain relatively detailed visual information in memory for natural scenes (Hollingworth and Henderson, 2002).”
Is a picture really worth a thousand words? Exploring the feasibility of graphical authentication systems (2005, background): “A recent attempt to accommodate the picture superiority effect and change blindness is the model of scene perception and memory proposed by Hollingworth and Henderson (2002).”
Detecting changes in real-world objects: The relationship between visual long-term memory and change blindness (2009, neutral): “5, 15 and 16).”
A taxonomy of external and internal attention. (2011, neutral): “As direct evidence, Hollingworth & Henderson (2002) have demonstrated that people retain fairly detailed information from attended objects within scenes during search.”
Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. (2006, background): “Over the past decade, research on the change blindness has shown that in order to perceive the details of an object, one must attend to it (Henderson & Hollingworth, 1999; Hollingworth, Schrock & Henderson, 2001; Hollingworth & Henderson, 2002; Rensink, 2000; Rensink, O’Regan & Clark, 1997; Simons”
Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm (2005, neutral): “All these methods require considerable A u t h o r ' s p e r s o n a l”
Authentication using graphical passwords: effects of tolerance and image choice (2005, methodology): “Other psychological research on images has shown that people can remember detailed visual information in natural scenes [18] and that the content, affect, and organization of images influence the ability to remember an image [8, 21].”
Why don't we see changes? The role of attentional bottlenecks and limited visual memory (2006, background): “More recently, Hollingworth and Henderson have developed a task that can be considered to be a hybrid of picture recognition memory and change blindness paradigms (Henderson & Hollingworth, 2003; Hollingworth, 2004; Hollingworth & Henderson, 2002).”
Visual search and selective attention (2006, background): “An alternative position is that visual representations do not necessarily disintegrate after the withdrawal of attention; rather, representations from already attended regions can be accumulated within scene-based memory (eg, Hollingworth, & Henderson, 2002 ; Hollingworth, Williams, & Henderson, 2”
VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES (2007, background): “…visual detail of fixated regions of a viewed scene is preserved over relatively long periods of time (Castelhano & Henderson, 2005; Henderson & Hollingworth, 2003; Hollingworth, 2004; Hollingworth & Henderson, 2002; Williams, Henderson, & Zacks, 2005; for review see Henderson & Castelhano, 2005).”
Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety (2008, background): “We suggest that three fundamental features of the measurement approaches associated with the VA and AM hypotheses highlight the degree to which the hypotheses are complementary.”
Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. (2003, background): “evidence suggests that good memory for the visual detail of a viewed scene is preserved over relatively long periods of time [41, 42 ].”
Biometric Measures for Interactive Advertising Research (2011, methodology): “…field (sensitive to even miniature saccades and capable of working without a light and with eyes closed, as widely used in studies on sleep); and optical eye-trackers, which reflect light, typically infrared, in the eye and measure it with a video camera or some specially designed optical…”
Graphical passwords: Learning from the first twelve years (2012, background): “Hollingworth and Henderson [56] show that people retain accurate, detailed, visual memories of objects to which they previously attended in visual scenes; this suggests that users may be able to accurately remember specific parts of an image as their password if they initially focused on them.”
The attentional theory of cinematic continuity (2012, background): “Our memory for a scene is populated only by the details that are attended and the longer the time since a detail was last attended, the less likely that detail is to still be active in working memory (Hollingworth & Henderson, 2002).”
How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scenes? (2005, neutral): “…COGNITION, 2005, 12 (6), 852±877 representations available at the locus of attention (O'Regan, 1992; Rensink, 2000, 2002; Wolfe, 1999; but see Henderson & Hollingworth, 2003; Hollingworth, 2003; Hollingworth & Henderson, 2002; Simons, Chabris, Schnur, & Levin, 2002).”