The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21): further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates.

By A. Osman, J. Wong, C. Bagge, S. Freedenthal, P. Gutierrez, G. Lozano. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2012

1,020 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5b7ddaf69a052d2a3c2c2faf3f8aee75fc0d166

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of psychological distress among students at an Australian university (2016, methodology): “The DASS sub-scales have been found to have high reliability (Antony et al. 1998; Henry and Crawford 2005; Osman et al. 2012) and the DASS has been used in several published studies with university students, making comparisons possible.”
The Impact of a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Course (MBSR) on Well-Being and Academic Attainment of Sixth-form Students (2015, background): “ternal consistency and concurrent validity with other depression/anxiety measures (Osman et al. 2012).”
Psychometric Properties of the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) in a Greek Sample (2018, background): “, 2015; Clara, Cox, & Enns, 2001) and nonclinical samples (Bados, Solanas, & Andrés, 2005; Henry & Crawford, 2005; Norton, 2007; Osman et al., 2012; Sinclair et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2016) of different cultural contexts.”
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) (2018, methodology): “The DASS is not intended to be used as a diagnostic psychometric instrument that three scales of the measure assess dimensional components of anxiety, depression and stress characterised by distinct syndromes (Osman et al., 2012).”
Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion (2021, methodology): “This study measured Cronbach's alpha scores for the DASS-21 subscales comparable to previous studies using the short form (Henry & Crawford, 2005; Osman et al., 2012).”
Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures (2016, neutral): “Osman et al. (2012) 21 General General distress .97 .86 .68 .70 .06 .96 .95 (DASS 21) 7 G1 Depression .94 .33 .89 .72 7 G2 Anxiety .91 .32 .87 .72 7 G3 Stress .94 .15 .91 .67 12.”
The Italian version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: Factor structure and psychometric properties on community and clinical samples. (2015, methodology): “48, respectively) [7,12,13], and good construct validity [11].”