Globalization and the Decline of the Welfare State in Less-Developed Countries

By Nita Rudra. International Organization, 2002

540 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5a88a81523370f233d8674469d3d521d27e9dd8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Gender Studies

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Welfare States in Developing Countries: Unique or Universal? (2007, unknown): “By implication or design, studies in comparative political economy (CPE) and international political economy (IPE) treat less developed countries (LDCs) as more or less identical to one another or, at the other extreme, as nations marked by tremendous politico-economic diversity.”
The impact of globalization on the composition of government expenditures: Evidence from panel data (2006, unknown): “Rudra (2002) , for example, observes that defending welfare benefits under the pressures of globalization is much easier in OECD countries that in LDCs.”
Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship (2014, background): “In countries with full employment and high income levels, people tend to have better education opportunities, better access to healthcare services and more developed social security programs (Rudra, 2002).”
Voting in Open Economies (2007, background): “Many draw on this logic to paint an uncertain future for independent national policies (e.g., Andrews, 1994; Hays, 2003; Mishra, 1999; Moses, 2000; Rudra, 2002; Wibbels & Arce, 2003).”
Globalization, Democracy, and Effective Welfare Spending in the Developing World (2005, methodology): “See Silver (2004) for a discussion of the importance of greater “marketplace bargaining power.”
Sovereign Debt and Regime Type: Reconsidering the Democratic Advantage (2012, background): “…Biglaiser, and DeRouen 2007, it is still considered a “distant third” relative to Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s+ T+ Sinclair 2003+ 16+ See Rodrik 1997; Häusler 2002; Rudra 2002; Rudra and Haggard 2005; and Das 2006+ 17+ Sinclair 2005, 23+ 18+ For more detailed information on the evolution of…”
International Negotiations and Domestic Politics: The Case of IMF Labor Market Conditionality (2012, methodology): “…subsequently used by Rudra to identify high-skill and low-skill industries in developing countries+68 65+ Rudra 2005+ 66+ Frenkel and Peetz 1998+ 67+ Rudra 2002+ 68+ See Wood and Mayer 2001; and Rudra 2002+ The second component of the plp measure, surplus labor, is drawn from the development…”