International Negotiations and Domestic Politics: The Case of IMF Labor Market Conditionality

By T. Caraway, S. Rickard, M. Anner. International Organization, 2012

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/539d5b6812c403bb6865c3d64b988f881e0bcf41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Axel Dreher
2. J. Vreeland
3. Jan-Egbert Sturm
4. L. King
5. Thomas Stubbs
6. A. Kentikelenis
7. R. Stone
8. Mark Copelovitch

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Jan-Egbert Sturm
2. J. Vreeland
3. L. King
4. Thomas Stubbs
5. A. Kentikelenis
6. Axel Dreher
7. Niklas Potrafke
8. Diego F. Hernández

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Axel Dreher
2. J. Vreeland
3. L. King
4. Thomas Stubbs
5. A. Kentikelenis
6. Jan-Egbert Sturm
7. Niklas Potrafke
8. Friedrich Schneider

Citations in the corpus

• Politics and IMF Conditionality (2015, background): “10 See Ivanova et al. 2003, Gould 2003, Bulí ř and Moon 2004, Dreher and Jensen 2007, Dreher et al. 2009, Copelovitch 2010, Caraway et al. 2012.”
• IMF conditionality and development policy space, 1985–2014 (2016, methodology): “Despite this, previous studies have shown the measure is a suitable proxy for the intrusiveness of conditionality (Caraway, Rickard, and Anner 2012; Copelovitch 2010; Dreher and Jensen 2007; Dreher, Sturm, and Vreeland 2009; 2015), and it has been fruitfully employed in the IMF’s own studies (Bulir…”