Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network

By Richard Van Noorden. Nature, 2014

627 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f587adc5899375384d4e239543540a57fe29570f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Vincent Larivière
2. S. Haustein
3. Hagit Meishar-Tal
4. Sam Work
5. Cassidy R. Sugimoto
6. Efrat Pieterse

In Molecular Biology

1. Hagit Meishar-Tal
2. S. Haustein
3. Sam Work
4. Vincent Larivière
5. Cassidy R. Sugimoto
6. Efrat Pieterse

Citations in the corpus

• Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2016, methodology): “…using Twitter regularly seem to use it professionally to some degree—for research-related discussions and communicating with others in the field (Van Noorden, 2014)—a large share of their activity is personal (Bowman, 2015; Haustein, Bowman, Holmberg, Peters, & Larivière, 2014; Mou, 2014;…”
• Why Do Academics Use Academic Social Networking Sites (2017, background): “The sites, used by millions (Van Noorden, 2014), constitute a major addition to scientific media.”