Development of Identity: Gender Makes a Difference
By P. Cramer. 2000
106 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5857a48ec13ec2c5bce758972a0c4308b4ad1ed
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- K. Luyckx
- Luc Goossens
- W. Beyers
- Bart Soenens
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Seth J. Schwartz
- J. Block
- Holly L. Lewis
In Sociology and Political Science
- K. Luyckx
- Bart Soenens
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Luc Goossens
- W. Beyers
- J. Block
- Holly L. Lewis
- Tera D. Letzring
Citations in the corpus
- Identity Statuses Based on 4 Rather Than 2 Identity Dimensions: Extending and Refining Marcia's Paradigm (2005, result): “The results confirmed the well-established fact that adolescents in the Achievement Cluster and Foreclosure Cluster displayed a better profile of adjustment on various indicators than in the Moratorium Cluster and in the Diffused Diffusion Cluster (Cramer, 2000; Marcia, 1980, 1993).”
- Ego-control and ego-resiliency: Generalization of self-report scales based on personality descriptions from acquaintances, clinicians, and the self (2005, methodology): “Cramer (2000) generated ER prototype-derived scores from a self-report CAQ and found that ER was pos- 398 T.D. Letzring et al. / Journal of Research in Personality 39 (2005) 395–422 itively correlated with measures of self-esteem and negatively correlated with anxiety and depression.”
- Differences in Ego Identity Among College Students Across Age, Ethnicity, and Gender (2003, background): “Another possibility is that issues of relatedness may play a role in women’s identity development that is different from that of men (Cramer, 2000).”
- Predictors of victimisation across direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying (2012, background): “…a sense of connectedness and attachment to others which may lead them to critically judge their parents’ behaviour, as in the parent loneliness measure (Cramer 2000; Patterson, Sochting, and Marcia 1992), supporting the idea that loneliness may refer to emotional, rather than cognitive, evaluation.”