Differences in Ego Identity Among College Students Across Age, Ethnicity, and Gender

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Identity styles, dimensions, statuses, and functions: Making connections among identity conceptualizations (2013, methodology): “Gender may be of importance in identity formation (Lewis, 2003; Schwartz, Adamson, Ferrer-Wreder, Dillon, & Berman, 2006).”
Community and religious involvement as contexts of identity change across late adolescence and emerging adulthood (2011, methodology): “The items for each subscale were averaged to form continuous composite scores for each identity status (for examples of prior studies using continuous status scores, see Lewis, 2003; Markstrom-Adams & Adams, 1995; Shanahan & Pychyl, 2007).”
Identity Processes in Adulthood: Diverging Domains (2005, background): “, Lewis, 2003; Pastorino & Dunham, 1997), there has been more diffusion regarding politics as compared to the other domains at college age and early adulthood. This study indicates that the salience of politics did not increase with age for this sample. Instead, it appears that the domains that dema”
Friendship and Romantic Relationship Qualities in Emerging Adulthood: Differential Associations with Identity Development and Achieved Adulthood Criteria (2009, background): “Both identity foreclosure and achievement are considered to be adult identities (Lewis 2003), yet identity foreclosure was not related to any of the romantic relationship qualities (nor friendship qualities).”