The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making
By R. VanRullen, Simon J. Thorpe. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2001
774 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5623823baccf3d7024b71b35e1474fd4ab4e61c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Keith Rayner
- Antonio Torralba
- Aude Oliva
- Moshe Bar
- Bruno Rossion
- Christof Koch
- Pietro Perona
- Alexander Pollatsek
Citations in the corpus
- Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: visual processing speed revisited. (2006, background): “While the interpretation of these diVerential eVects is controversial (Johnson & Olshausen, 2003; VanRullen & Thorpe, 2001b ), behavioural measurements avoid this”
- Spike-based strategies for rapid processing (2001, background): “Third, it is not specific for biologically important categories like animals, because it is equally fast and accurate for a completely artifactual category, namely, means of transport (Van Rullen & Thorpe, 2001b).”
- E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading (2006, methodology): “Several recent experiments using physiological methods have given consistent estimates of the duration of the ''eye-to-brain'' lag: approximately 50 ms (Clark, Fan, & Hillard, 1995; Foxe & Simpson, 2002; Mouchetant-Rostaing, Giard, Bentin, Aguera, & Pernier , 2000; Van Rullen & Thorpe, 2001).”
- Neural reflections of meaning in gesture, language, and action (2009, background): “It was found that within 150 ms after picture onset, the ERP started to diverge based upon the presence or absence of an animal (Thorpe et al. 1996; VanRullen and Thorpe 2001).”
- Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 (2008, background): “For instance, ERP and forced-choice saccadic eye movement studies indicate that categorization of animal pictures in visual scenes can take place within 120–150 ms following stimulus onset, including the perceptual decision (Kirchner and Thorpe, 2006; Thorpe et al., 1996; VanRullen and Thorpe, 2001)”
- Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. (2002, background): “ERP and MEG studies show that some coarse categorization of visual images occurs in occipitotemporal cortex as early as 50 ms to 90 ms after stimulus onset (Seeck et al., 1997; Van Rullen & Thorpe, 2001), consistent with gender categorization of faces at latencies of 45 ms to 85 ms (Mouchetant-Rosta”
- A boy primed Sue: feature‐based processing and person construal (2007, background): “What this suggests is that early, task-independent visual processes extract featural information from faces, information that undoubtedly serves as the basis for—but should not be seen as interchangeable with—subsequent target categorization ( VanRullen & Thorpe, 2001 ).”
- Affective Judgments of Faces Modulate Early Activity (∼160 ms) within the Fusiform Gyri (2002, background): “This strategy has proven powerful in recent cases of early task-related ERP modulations not confined to a given component (Braeutigam et al., 2001; VanRullen and Thorpe, 2001).”
- A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition (2003, background): “Here the focus is specifically on the propagation of information and analysis in the cortex during the recognition process.”
- Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex (2003, background): “…–170 ms, between pictures of faces and other objects at occipito-temporal (Bentin et al., 1996; Botzel et al., 1995; Eimer, 2000a, 2000b; Halgren et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2000; Rossion et al., 2000; Schendan et al., 1998) or centro-frontal sites (Jeffreys, 1989, 1996; VanRullen and Thorpe, 2001).”
- Visual objects in context (2004, background): “As a result, a clear, prototypical, isolated object (usually on a computer screen in the laboratory) is recognized in less than 150 ms (Ref”