The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research

By F. Guldenmund. 2000

1,880 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Social Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4ff83e1311d7e09225774e02dc695b6aedb7ff8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

In Social Psychology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. (2013, background): “An excellent review (Guldenmund , 2000) indicates the complexity of safety climate as a psychological construct and exposes the Big 5 concept as somewhat premature.”
National cultures and safety orientation: A study of seafarers working for Norwegian shipping companies (2007, background): “…in definitions and discussions; Hale (2000) writes about cultural confusion; Zhang, Wiegmann, Von Thaden, Sharma, & Mitchell (2002) consider safety culture to be a concept in chaos; Guldenmund (2000) and Sorensen (2000) claim that safety culture and climate are concepts with no clear definition.”
Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations (2003, neutral): “11 These staff based assessments are structured self-report surveys that elicit perceptions of the working environment from the perspective of staff at the ‘‘sharp end’’ of healthcare delivery in various settings (for example, emergency rooms, intensive care units, hospitals, nursing homes, or…”
Safety leadership practices for organizational safety compliance: developing a research agenda from a review of the literature (2016, result): “…were read and analysed; a number comparable to those found in other literature reviews in the safety field (e.g. a review of safety culture by Guldenmund (2000) drew on 21 papers, while another by Drupsteen and Guldenmund (2014) on learning from safety incidents, accidents and disasters drew…”
From safety culture to safety orientation: Validation and simplification of a safety orientation scale using a sample of seafarers working for Norwegian ship owners (2009, background): “Most definitions of culture are based on norms and values (Guldenmund, 2000; Schein, 1985).”
Safety climate dimensions, leader–member exchange, and organizational support as predictors of upward safety communication in a sample of rail industry workers (2010, background): “The third factor (safety climate) has not been thoroughly analyzed (Flin, 2007; Flin, Mearns, O'Connor, and Bryden, 2000; Guldenmund, 2000; Mueller, DaSilva, Townsend, and Tetrick, 1999).”
Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys (2005, background): “2 Because the healthcare industry involves high risk for morbidity and mortality, it is considered to be a high hazard industry.”
Toward a model for forming psychological safety climate in construction project management (2015, methodology): “This is particularly essential in the social sciences, where the constructs are usually multi-dimensional (Guldenmund, 2000).”
Perspectives on safety culture (2000, background): “Some researchers distinguish between safety culture and safety climate (e.g. Cooper and Mearns et al., 1998), while attempts have also been made to derive composite models (e.g. Guldenmund, 2000).”