Entice-Br: The Effects of Backstop Technology R&D on Climate Policy Models

By David Popp. 2006

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4f58346ec4e103631ad2160cf0ceb543a4dfe44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The Dynamics of Carbon and Energy Intensity in a Model of Endogenous Technical Change (2006, background): “In order to account for the difference between private and public return to investments in R&D, we follow Popp (2004) and model the positive externality of knowledge creation by assuming that the return on R&D investment is four times higher than the one in physical capital.”
Climate Change Mitigation Options and Directed Technical Change: A Decentralized Equilibrium Analysis (2011, methodology): “5In our model, we replace the cost function of fossil fuel and backstop from Popp (2006a) and the cost function of sequestration from Gerlagh (2006) by their corresponding production functions in order to derive an utility/technology canonical model.”
COMBINING MULTIPLE CLIMATE POLICY INSTRUMENTS: HOW NOT TO DO IT (2010, unknown): “The views expressed in this paper represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the host institutions or funders.”
Uncertain R&D, backstop technology and GHGs stabilization (2007, unknown): “…by investing in knowledge IR&Dback through an innovation possibility frontier of this kind: KR&Dback n; t + 1ð Þ= 1−δð ÞKR&Dback n; tð Þ + aIR&Dback t;nð ÞbKR&Dback t;nð Þc ð6Þ 5 This specification is similar to that used for experience curves, and has been applied to backstops by Popp (2006).”
Environment, Directed Technical Change and Economic Policy (2008, methodology): “Then we can compute LoR in terms of go R (see ( 12 )).”
Modeling endogenous technological change for climate policy analysis (2008, background): “Popp (2004, 2006a) provides a good example of this approach in an economy-wide production function.”
Can tourism be part of the decarbonized global economy? The costs and risks of alternate carbon reduction policy pathways (2015, background): “There is much debate about the level of cost of such backstop technologies (Popp, 2006).”
Learning or Lock-In: Optimal Technology Policies to Support Mitigation (2011, methodology): “…industry suggest 0.2 ≤ φ ≤ 0.6 (Irwin and Klenow, 1994; Gruber, 1998; Barrios and Strobl, 2004).11 Within related integrated assessment or policy assessment models, spillover rates usually range between 50 and 80 percent (Jones and Williams, 1998; Popp, 2006; Fischer and Newell, 2008).”
The Economic Geography of Global Warming (2021, background): “Following Golosov et al. (2014), Hassler et al. (2019), and Popp (2006), among others, energy and other factors are aggregated through a Cobb–Douglas production function where ( 1 − χ)μ denotes the share of energy in the production process.”
The impact of technological change on climate protection and welfare: Insights from the model MIND (2005, background): “These results confirm to some extent those of Popp (2004b) , who concludes from the ENTICE-BR model that adding a backstop technology (without learningby-doing) has the largest potential for reducing the welfare losses of climate protection.”
Optimal Taxes on Fossil Fuel in General Equilibrium (2011, unknown): “Popp (2006) also looked at a backstop technology, but considered endogenous R&D toward it.”
Interim monitoring of cost dynamics for publicly supported energy technologies (2009, methodology): “the circumstances mentioned above, experience curves are used because optimal technology policy decisions depend heavily on future rates of technological change ( Popp, 2006; Sue Wing, 2006).”