Learning or Lock-In: Optimal Technology Policies to Support Mitigation

By Matthias Kalkuhl, Ottmar Edenhofer, K. Lessmann. Social Science Research Network, 2011

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We investigate conditions that aggravate market failures in energy innovations, and suggest optimal policy instruments to address them. Using an intertemporal general equilibrium model we show that “small” market imperfections may trigger a several decades lasting dominance of an incumbent energy technology over a dynamically more efficient competitor, given that the technologies are very good substitutes. Such a “lock-in” into an inferior technology causes significantly higher welfare losses than market failure alone, notably under ambitious mitigation targets. More than other innovative industries, energy markets are prone to these lock-ins because electricity from different technologies is an almost perfect substitute. To guide government intervention, we compare welfare-maximizing technology policies in addition to carbon pricing with regard to their efficiency, effectivity, and robustness. Technology quotas and feed-in-tariffs turn out to be only insignificantly less efficient than first-best subsidies and seem to be more robust against small perturbations.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cf0f8d0f1884fcee70580337f891c3edea69a6b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Felix Creutzig
  2. Michael Jakob
  3. L. Mattauch
  4. R. Pietzcker
  5. Charlie Wilson
  6. Cameron Hepburn
  7. P. Lehmann
  8. Ottmar Edenhofer

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Felix Creutzig
  2. L. Mattauch
  3. Ottmar Edenhofer
  4. R. Wiser
  5. Lion Hirth
  6. Cameron Hepburn
  7. Charlie Wilson
  8. R. Pietzcker

Citations in the corpus