COMBINING MULTIPLE CLIMATE POLICY INSTRUMENTS: HOW NOT TO DO IT
By Sam Fankhauser, Cameron Hepburn, Jisung Park. 2010
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5adbeb6b787bbe931213dfb473781575f1e1601b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- J. Bergh
- T. Konc
- Ivan Savin
- Godefroy Grosjean
- Joël Foramitti
- Ottmar Edenhofer
- Sabine Fuss
- Nicolas Koch
In Environmental Engineering
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- J. Bergh
- Godefroy Grosjean
- Ottmar Edenhofer
- Sabine Fuss
- Nicolas Koch
- Jesse D. Jenkins
- Stefan Drews
- S. Sorrell
Citations in the corpus
- Political economy constraints on carbon pricing policies: What are the implications for economic efficiency, environmental efficacy, and climate policy design? (2014, background): “…typically favor carbon pricing policies over other prescriptions and generally argue against a mix of overlapping policy instruments, such as carbon pricing alongside subsidies or mandates for renewable energy sources or sectorspecific emissions regulations (e.g., Fankhauser et al., 2010).”
- Designing an effective climate-policy mix: accounting for instrument synergy (2021, background): “bining emissions trading and sector-specific targets or standards (Duan et al., 2017; Fankhauser et al., 2010; Schatzki & Stavins, 2012).”
- Causes of the EU ETS price drop: Recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything? - New evidence (2014, background): “Theoretical work of Fankhauser et al. (2010) and Fischer and Preonas (2010) suggests that the overlapping policies work at crosspurposes , since RES injections displace CO 2 emissions within the EU ETS and thereby reduce the EUA demand and price.”