An evolutionary perspective of biological invasions

By B. Hänfling, J. Kollmann. 2002

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f455797894f048754784978e0d969d34a93e148b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. E. Siemann
2. W. E. Rogers
3. O. Bossdorf
4. J. Crooks
5. H. Auge
6. B. Mandák
7. K. Bímová
8. R. Petit

In Genetics

1. E. Siemann
2. W. E. Rogers
3. J. Crooks
4. R. Petit
5. M. Bañuelos
6. P. Neumann
7. P. Castro-Díez
8. D. Thomson

In Insect Science

1. J. Crooks
2. B. Mandák
3. K. Bímová
4. R. Petit
5. E. Siemann
6. W. E. Rogers
7. P. Neumann
8. P. Castro-Díez

Citations in the corpus

• Invasive ecotypes tolerate herbivory more effectively than native ecotypes of the Chinese tallow tree Sapium sebiferum (2004, background): “2000; Hänfling & Kollmann 2002; Lee 2002).”
• Asexual spread versus sexual reproduction and evolution in Japanese Knotweed s.l. sets the stage for the “Battle of the Clones” (2009, background): “Many biologists see this point as a wonderful opportunity to study ‘‘evolution in action’’, which can generate important information for evolutionary biology (Lee 2002) as well as help to explain the invasibility of individual taxa ( Abbott 1992; Ferris et al. 1997; Bleeker 2003; Manda ´k et al. 20”
• The significance of the sub-Antarctic Kerguelen Islands for the assessment of the vulnerability of native communities to climate change, alien insect invasions and plant viruses (2011, background): “Since the twentieth century, human-mediated movement of species to regions outside their natural geographical distribution has increased significantly (Hänfling and Kollmann 2002; Murphy and Cheesman 2006).”
• The biology of the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida, Coleoptera: Nitidulidae): Gaps in our knowledge of an invasive species (2004, unknown): “In recent decades, the frequency of biological invasions has increased to an unprecedented level, stimulating a multitude of research projects in population biology and community ecology (Hänfling and Kollmann, 2002).”
• Lag times and exotic species: The ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion (2005, background): “Evolutionary effects of invaders will tend to be the slowest to emerge and hardest to predict, although there has been increasing interest in these types of invader impacts (Mooney & Cleland, 2001; Hanfling & Kollmann, 2002; Lee, 2002; Cox, 2004).”
• The role of eco-evolutionary experience in invasion success (2013, unknown): “Scientific awareness of evolutionary aspects in biological invasions has increased in the last decade (Sax and Brown 2000, Sakai et al. 2001, Hänfling and Kollmann 2002, Lee 2002, Sax et al. 2005, 2007, Facon et al. 2006, Kondoh 2006, Hufbauer and Torchin 2007).”
• Genetic bottleneck in invasive species: the potato tuber moth adds to the list (2008, background): “The simplest hypothesis therefore is that significant additive variance is present despite reduced molec- ular variation (as measured by mitochondrial mark- ers) which would allow adaptive evolution of bottlenecked populations (Hänfling and Kollmann 2002; Hassan et al. 2003).”
• Global invasions of the western honeybee (Apis mellifera) and the consequences for biodiversity (2005, background): “Such differences have repeatedly been reported for various species, underlining the importance of evolutionary processes for biological invasions (Hänfling & Kollmann, 2002).”
• Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations (2005, background): “Because of the unusual combination of genetic bottlenecks and changing selection regimes, invasive species may in fact provide some of the best model systems for studying rapid evolution in action (Thompson 1998; Reznick and Ghalambor 2001; Hänfling and Kollmann 2002; Lee 2002).”
• Latitudinal trends in growth and phenology of the invasive alien plant Impatiens glandulifera (Balsaminaceae) (2004, background): “Biological invasions are a dynamic area of current ecological research, because they can be used to address fundamental questions in ecology and evolution of species diversity and distribution (Drake et al ., 1989; Lodge, 1993; Sakai et al ., 2001; Hänfling & Kollmann, 2002; Lee, 2002).”
• The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence (2004, background): “It is difficult to meaningfully compare spread rates between different species or locations if the underlying dynamics are not well specified ( Grosholz 1996; Mack & Lonsdale 2001).”
• What explains the invading success of the aquatic mud snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Hydrobiidae, Mollusca)? (2008, background): “…(2003, 2004), Baruch & Bilbao (1999), Morton (1996), Gérard et al. (2003), Strayer (1999) High evolutionary potential to adapt to new environments Hänfling & Kollmann (2002), Lee (2002) Bold letters highlight those functional traits present in P. antipodarum and the studies reporting…”
• Biological invasions at the gene level (2004, background): “…evolutionary biology into invasion biology is very recent (for reviews see Levin, 2000, 2003, 2004; Mooney & Cleland, 2001; Sakai et al ., 2001; Hänfling & Kollmann, 2002; Lee, 2003; Schaal et al ., 2003; Petit et al ., 2004a), following a few isolated efforts (e.g. Barrett & Husband, 1990;…”