The Efficacy of Group Psychotherapy for Depression: A Meta-analysis and Review of the Empirical Research

By W. McDermut, I. Miller, Richard A. Brown. 2006

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. (2004, methodology): “9 For an example of the use of clinically significant change indices in meta-analytic investigations, see McDermut et al. (2001). 644 WESTEN, NOVOTNY, AND THOMPSON-BRENNER”
From GROW to GROUP: theoretical issues and a practical model for group coaching in organisations (2010, background): “Further, within the mental health field a wide range of approaches to group therapy are well-established, and group approaches to therapy are generally found to be at least as effective as individual therapy for a wide range of problems including anger management, substance abuse, social skills trai”
Is Group More Cost Effective than Individual Cognitive Behaviour Therapy? The Evidence is not Solid Yet (2007, background): “Of the articles looking at effectiveness, five provide support for the superiority of individual CBT in treating depression (Engels and Vermey, 1997; Nietzel, Russell, Hemming and Gretter, 1987; Rush and Watkins, 1981; Wierzbicki and Bartlett, 1987; Wilson, 1989), whereas five articles support the e”