Women, men and food: the significance of gender for nutritional attitudes and choices

By A. Beardsworth, Alan Bryman, T. Keil, J. Goode, C. Haslam, E. Lancashire. 2002

395 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Food Science, Pharmacy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4196356dab7bee0b194b569a4414f251c03709b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Wim Verbeke
2. M. Ruby

In Food Science

1. Mette Vabø
2. Wim Verbeke
3. M. Ruby
4. Håvard Hansen
5. Daniel L. Rosenfeld
6. K. Grunert
7. C. Bryant

In Pharmacy

1. Wim Verbeke
2. M. Ruby
3. H. Herzog

Citations in the corpus

• Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study. (2012, positive): “to be decreasing their meat consumption (Beardsworth et al., 2002; Fagerli & Wandel, 1999), and among a study of adolescents in the United States, with 48% of 16–17 year old girls finding vegetarianism socially desirable and hip, but only 22% of boys the same age reporting such sentiments (Walker, 1”
• Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions: A Review (2007, background): “Women are also more likely than men to change their diets for ethical reasons; Beardsworth et al. (2002) found that twice as many women as men in a probability sample of UK residents had modified their diets for animal welfare reasons (17% vs. 8%).”
• The Relationship between Food Preferences and Food Choice: A Theoretical Discussion (2014, background): “The gender differences mentioned above has been found in samples of both children (Cooke & Wardle, 2005) and adults (Beardsworth et al., 2002).”
• Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance--a review. (2008, neutral): “In general, women have been shown to be more reflective about food and health issues and they seem to have more moral and ecological misgivings about eating certain foods than men, who are more confident and demonstrate a rather uncritical and traditional view of eating (Beardsworth et al., 2002; Gi”
• Consumer willingness to pay for beef meat in a developing country : The effect of information regarding country of origin, price and animal handling prior to slaughter (2009, background): “Women tend to have more moral and environmental misgivings to eating meat than men, who tend to be less critical and more traditional in their eating habits (Beardsworth et al., 2002).”
• Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health? (2006, result): “Both in 2001 and 2004 female respondents reported a significantly higher perceived importance of food for health as compared to men, which is consistent with literature reporting a stronger health-orientation for food among females (Beardsworth et al., 2002; Kubberod, Ueland, Rodbotten, Westad, & Ri”