Emotional aging: recent findings and future trends.

By S. Scheibe, L. Carstensen. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2010

638 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3a4c9c60959df890890e2f379cdf2971bde0e39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

1. P. Hill
2. Kimberly K. McAdams
3. Richard E. Lucas
4. Mathias Allemand
5. M. B. Donnellan
6. Mike Martin
7. H. Zacher
8. S. Scheibe

In Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

1. H. Zacher
2. S. Scheibe
3. P. Hill
4. Richard E. Lucas
5. Mathias Allemand
6. Mike Martin
7. Pearl Ghaemmaghami
8. C. Rudolph

In Social Psychology

1. H. Zacher
2. Mike Martin
3. Pearl Ghaemmaghami
4. P. Hill
5. Kimberly K. McAdams
6. Richard E. Lucas
7. Mathias Allemand
8. M. B. Donnellan

Citations in the corpus

• Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: A synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion (2012, neutral): “While many have hypothesized that this, "rosy glow," of old age is due in part to more effective emotion regulation, to date there is little evidence directly testing this idea 188, 190, 191 .”
• The Role of Domain Satisfaction in Explaining the Paradoxical Association Between Life Satisfaction and Age (2011, background): “Finally, change in positive affect as well as changes in emotional abilities should be studied in association with life satisfaction because Scheibe and Carstensen (2010) have observed individuals in old age to have more developed emotional abilities.”
• A lifespan perspective on emotion regulation, stress, and well-being in the workplace (2013, background): “For example, research shows that emotional changes with age are surprisingly positive and characterized by maintenance and even growth (Charles & Carstensen, 2010; Scheibe & Carstensen, 2010).”
• Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. (2014, neutral): “…cited empirical articles (e.g., Charles et al., 2003; Kensinger et al., 2002; Mather & Carstensen, 2003), early theoretical articles (Carstensen & Mikels, 2005; Mather & Carstensen, 2005), and recent review articles (Charles & Carstensen, 2010; Reed & Carstensen, 2012; Scheibe & Carstensen, 2010).”
• Forgivingness and subjective well-being in adulthood: the moderating role of future time perspective (2012, background): “Numerous studies have provided empirical evidence for the notion that the perception of future time has important implications for emotion, cognition, motivation, and social relationships (for reviews, see Carstensen, Fung, & Charles, 2003; Charles & Carstensen, 2010; Scheibe & Carstensen, 2010).”