Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008

By Michael A. Nitsche, Leonardo G. Cohen, Eric M. Wassermann, Alberto Priori, N. Lang, Andrea Antal, Walter Paulus, Friedhelm Christoph Hummel, Paulo S Boggio, Felipe Fregni and 1 more. Brain Stimulation, 2008

2,837 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f39f6c6428db916024033edd4068acb2c73cfbdd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Neurology

Citations in the corpus

Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans (2013, background): “In recent years tDCS has been increasingly used in functional studies in healthy humans, as well as clinical applications in patients suffering from neuropsychiatric diseases (Nitsche et al. 2008; Nitsche & Paulus, 2011).”
Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery (2016, neutral): “Safety guidelines for using tDCS have been described by Nitsche et al. (2003) and by Bikson et al. (2009).”
Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines (2017, background): “…cm2, currents 1.5–2.1 mA) caused persisting skin lesions under the electrodes in some subjects, typically on the forehead or over frontal cortical areas (Frank et al. , 2010, Nitsche et al. , 2008, Palm et al. , 2008b, Riedel et al. , 2012, Rodriguez et al. , 2014, Wang et al. , 2015b) (Table 2).”
A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. (2011, methodology): “…effects and adverse events ; (2) as long-lasting, beneficial effects are expected to be achieved with daily tDCS sessions (Brunoni et al. 2010b ; Nitsche et al. 2008) ; AEs could also be enhanced and observed more often with such design; (3) phase II studies usually assess AEs in a quantitative…”
Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study. (2013, neutral): “Conventional bipolar tDCS is applied with two large (35 cm2) rectangular electrodes, resulting in directional modulation of neuronal excitability.”
Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non‐invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects (2010, background): “Both rTMS and tDCS techniques are considered safe if guidelines are adhered to (Nitsche et al. 2008; Priori et al. 2009).”
Frontal Midline Theta Oscillations during Working Memory Maintenance and Episodic Encoding and Retrieval (2013, background): “Another account of FMT is that theta oscillations might have systematic effects on strong and weak representations in a neural network (Norman et al., 2005, 2006a, 2007).”