Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans
By G. Batsikadze, V. Moliadze, Walter Paulus, Min-Fang Kuo, Michael A. Nitsche. Journal of Physiology, 2013
954 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc2ca2e314b42c72d6d61265213be8e7aba05d4e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Michael A. Nitsche
- John C. Rothwell
- Walter Paulus
- Leonardo G. Cohen
- Felipe Fregni
- C. J. Stagg
- David Liebetanz
- Andrea Antal
In Neurology
- Michael A. Nitsche
- Walter Paulus
- Leonardo G. Cohen
- Felipe Fregni
- John C. Rothwell
- C. J. Stagg
- David Liebetanz
- Andrea Antal
Citations in the corpus
- Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). (2015, neutral): “[102]).”
- Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: Current approaches and future perspectives (2016, neutral): “This may explain why no simple linear relationship seems to exist between stimulation intensity and the size or direction of TCS effects (Bastani and Jaberzadeh, 2012, 2013; Batsikadze et al., 2013; Moliadze et al., 2012).”
- Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields (2013, neutral): “, the direction of the excitability change has recently been shown to be intensity dependent (Batsikadze et al., 2013).”
- A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools (2015, methodology): “Once desired locations are identified, the electrode assembly must be affixed to the head for delivery of current.”
- Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. (2014, methodology): “057 mA/cm2) was determined by the fact that it is now becoming standard in an increasing number of behavioral, cognitive, and clinical studies due to an implicit assumption that higher intensities will enhance efficacy of stimulation [18,20].”
- tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases (2014, neutral): “Here, recent studies by (Batsikadze et al., 2013; Monte-Silva et al., 2012; Monte-Silva et al., 2010a) have yielded first important information on stimulation intensity, duration, and repetition intervals.”