Binding in short-term visual memory.
By M. E. Wheeler, Anne Treisman. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2002
990 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f38554089c57664766d765576b6034e162a7c8c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Klaus Oberauer
- R. Engle
- Nelson Cowan
- Keith Rayner
- George A. Alvarez
- Andrew R. A. Conway
- A. Hollingworth
- Oliver Wilhelm
Citations in the corpus
- TRoPICALS: a computational embodied neuroscience model of compatibility effects. (2010, background): “Bottom-up processes would guide attention based on the perceptual saliency of the various regions of the scene and objects (cf. Wheeler & Treisman, 2002, and Itti & Koch, 2000, Knudsen, 2007, on this; see Ognibene, Balkenius, & Baldassarre, 2008, for the proposal of an architecture that integrates…”
- The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects (2004, background): “However, recent work shows that objects with multiple values on a single dimension cannot be remembered as well as objects with a single value on that dimension ( Wheeler & Treisman, 2002 ).”
- Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex (2004, background): “Even though VSTM is essential for the execution of a wide array of perceptual and cognitive function”
- Cross-modal binding and working memory (2009, methodology): “Using a more direct test of binding memory than those implemented by Vogel et al. (2001), Wheeler and Treisman (2002) observed that accuracy for feature combinations was equivalent to single feature conditions only when a single test probe was used.”
- E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading (2006, background): “This assumption is based on a considerable amount of evidence that attention is necessary to ‘‘bind’’ together the features of visual ‘‘objects’’ so that they can be encoded as single, unified representations (Pollatsek & Digman, 1977; Treisman & Gelade, 1980; Treisman & Souther, 1986; Wheeler & Tr”
- Bound feature combinations in visual short-term memory are fragile but influence long-term learning (2009, background): “For example, Wheeler and Treisman (2002) proposed that individual features are stored in VSTM automatically, but that the process of binding these features or the maintenance thereof requires extra effort and attention.”
- Location and binding in visual working memory (2006, methodology): “Wheeler and Treisman (2002) ruled out this account in their experiments by presenting the whole display but cuing just one item at test.”
- An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory (2008, background): “1B shows these predicted equal-setsize ROC lines (solid lines) for the case where capacity k 3 and M (2, 5, 8).”
- Visual memory for natural scenes: Evidence from change detection and visual search (2006, background): “(Wheeler & Treisman, 2002, p. 62) .”
- Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations (2003, background): “Wheeler & Treisman, 2002; Vogel, Woodman, & Luck, 2001; Luck & Vogel, 1997)., Wheeler & Treisman, 2002; Vogel et al., 2001; Luck & Vogel, 1997).”
- Which Working Memory Functions Predict Intelligence (2008, background): “Based on experimental work (Wheeler & Treisman, 2002) and simulations of temporary bindings in neural networks (Raffone & Wolters, 2001) we argue that the brain has a limited capacity for upholding multiple bindings simultaneously.”