Genetic variation in cessation of growth and frost hardiness and consequences for adaptation of Pinus sylvestris to climatic changes
By O. Savolainen, Folmer Bokma, Rosario García-Gil, P. Komulainen, T. Repo. 2004
167 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f37d35e9ece5a2e3ff2a4abce7f8f25fb57354cc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- I. Chuine
- Gil Bohrer
- Steven Higgins
- G. Rehfeldt
- M. Sykes
- Ran Nathan
- Thomas Hickler
- Wilfried Thuiller
Citations in the corpus
- Intra‐specific variability and plasticity influence potential tree species distributions under climate change (2011, background): “For example, Savolainen et al. (2004) have shown that the rate of evolution of P. sylvestris will be too slow to keep pace with predicted climate changes, but other populations might display higher genetic variance for adaptive traits.”
- Empirical Analyses of Plant‐Climate Relationships for the Western United States (2006, background): “…developed herein, (3) rates of immigration for species appropriate for the new profile (Clark et al. 1998; Higgins et al. 2003), and (4) estimates of the microevolutionary responses that will eventually convey adaptedness (Rehfeldt et al. 1999, 2002; Etterson and Shaw 2001; Savolainen et al. 2004).”
- Modelling exploration of the future of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) under climate change—Range, abundance, genetic diversity and adaptive response (2010, background): “More recent approaches include adaptive traits with defined genetic controls into mechanistic tree models (see Savolainen et al., 2004; Kramer et al., 2008)).”
- Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses (2008, background): “2003b; Gienapp et al. 2006) and evaluate (e.g. Billington & Pelham 1991; Savolainen et al. 2004) the interplay between selection and genetics in the context of climate change.”
- Temperature dependence of the reproduction niche and its relevance for plant species distributions (2012, background): “, 2008; Chuine, 2010), despite the possibility of genetic adaptation of phenology to global warming (Savolainen et al., 2004).”
- Genetic maladaptation of coastal Douglas‐fir seedlings to future climates (2007, background): “During the next century, there may be ample time for species with short generation times to respond via migration and in situ evolution – but this is not true for forest trees (Rehfeldt et al., 2001, 2002; Savolainen et al., 2004).”
- Impact of climate and drought events on the growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenances (2013, background): “The disproportional reduction of BAI of the northern provenances S15 and LV4 during 2006 at WSD could be linked to an earlier growth cessation of these populations due to a photoperiodic effect described in different studies (Oleksyn et al., 1992; Savolainen, 2004; Taeger et al., 2013).”
- Long-distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change (2012, background): “5, consistently with estimates in other species (Savolainen et al. 2004).”
- Adaptive vs. neutral genetic diversity: implications for landscape genetics (2006, background): “The equivalent measurement referring to population differentiation at adaptive genes is QST, which can be written as (Savolainen et al. 2004):”
- Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. (2005, background): “Delayed reproductive maturity will reduce the number of generations that can establish during any given period of time, whilst long lifespan (and hence low turnover) of individuals will reduce the opportunities for establishment of new genotypes within existing populations (Savolainen et al. 2004).”