Impact of climate and drought events on the growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenances

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effects of stand composition and tree size on resistance and resilience to drought in sessile oak and Scots pine (2015, background): “This species’ radial growth dynamics, 489 which have been extensively studied in Europe, show a stronger dependency on conditions at 490 the end of spring and during the summer months (Weber t al., 2007; Eilmann et al., 2009; 491 Eilmann et al., 2011; Zang et al., 2012; Taeger et al., 2013).”
Species mixing reduces drought susceptibility of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) – Site water supply and fertility modify the mixing effect (2020, background): “…as species (Zang et al., 2011; Eilmann and Rigling, 2012; Anderegg and HilleRisLambers, 2016; Thurm et al., 2016; Vitasse et al., 2019), provenance (Taeger et al., 2013), competitive status (Zang et al., 2012), age (Thurm et al., 2016) and size (Jucker et al., 2014; Bennett et al., 2015;…”
Drought responses by individual tree species are not often correlated with tree species diversity in European forests (2016, unknown): “Furthermore, different provenances of a given species can vary in their hydraulic architecture (Poyatos et al. 2007) or other water-402 related traits (Ponton et al. 2002) and thus in their response to droughts (Taeger et al. 2013), thereby influencing the way a given species interacts with others.”