Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change.

By Alistair S. Jump, Josep Peñuelas. Ecology Letters, 2005

1,481 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cb4e5dd94c78bb633ec7bd4da97a7a830f757ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Adaptation, Plasticity, and Extinction in a Changing Environment: Towards a Predictive Theory (2010, background): “There are three mechanisms by which a population can persist when its local environment changes: dispersal to track its preferred environment in space, genetic evolution to the new local conditions, or phenotypic plasticity [17,18].”
Mediterranean island biodiversity and climate change: the last 10,000 years and the future (2016, background): “Due to the rapid pace of climate change, adaptation has an important role in species responses (Jump and Peñuelas 2005).”
Intra‐specific variability and plasticity influence potential tree species distributions under climate change (2011, background): “Evolving in situ is one possible solution for species facing future climate change (Jump & Peñuelas, 2005), but the characteristics of most tree species preclude this option.”
Adaptive microevolutionary responses to simulated global warming in Simocephalus vetulus: a mesocosm study (2007, background): “Alternatively, populations may persist locally through phenotypic plasticity and microevolution of life history traits to deal with increasing temperature (reviewed by Post et al., 2001; Pulido & Berthold, 2004; Jump & Penuelas, 2005), which may buffer against changes in community structure.”
Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses (2008, background): “2005; Jump & Penuelas 2005; Thomas 2005; see also Stockwell et al .”
Invasive weed species’ threats to global biodiversity: Future scenarios of changes in the number of invasive species in a changing climate (2020, background): “Based on the most recent studies, plant species and associated IWS are likely to track climates most favorable to their survival (Jump and Penuelas, 2005).”
Home site advantage in two long‐lived arctic plant species: results from two 30‐year reciprocal transplant studies (2012, background): “…they are poorly adapted, individual longevity and low rates of seedling establishment reduce the ability of new genotypes, from populations adapted to warmer environments, to invade, resulting in a temporal lag in adaptive response (Jump & Penuelas 2005; Aitken et al. 2008; Thuiller et al. 2008).”
Effects of a simulated heat wave on photophysiology and gene expression of high- and low-latitude populations of Zostera marina (2011, background): “…that measurements are taken in a controlled environment (i.e. a common mesocosm setup), such comparisons could identify heritable differences in ecophysiological traits (Ackerly et al. 2000) that are likely to be important under a changing climate (Jump & Penuelas 2005, Millien et al. 2006).”
Quaternary palaeoecology and nature conservation: a general review with examples from the neotropics (2011, background): “These biotic shifts coincided with the late YDeearly Holocene global warming (Kaufman et al., 2004; Kaplan and Wolfe, 2006) and were locally characterised by a decrease in the hydrological balance.”
A global assessment of current and future biodiversity vulnerability to habitat loss–climate change interactions (2016, background): “phenotypic plasticity or micro-evolution) to adapt to climate change in-situ because both their genetic and phenotypic diversity may have been reduced by declines in population size or connectivity (Jump and Peñuelas, 2005).”
Climate change effects on plant disease: genomes to ecosystems. (2006, background): “As a result of climate change, the abundance of particular species may change rapidly, as species may lose their ability to recover from other perturbations such as diseases, insect herbivores, and climatic extremes within a background of climate changes (60, 72, 136, 136).”
Hutchinson's duality: The once and future niche (2009, neutral): “51, 52, and 55).”
Traits to stay, traits to move: a review of functional traits to assess sensitivity and adaptive capacity of temperate and boreal trees to climate change (2016, background): “These knowledge gaps limit our capacity to understand how local populations will adapt to new climatic conditions and to estimate the risk of extinction (Jump and Penuelas 2005).”