The Next Generation of the ITC Test Translation and Adaptation Guidelines

By R. K. Hambleton. 2001

577 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f36dba285e18c5627cd0ef35aad421b3c7816d75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Alexandre J. S. Morin
2. G. Moors
3. Miloš Kankaraš
4. Deniz Canel Çınarbaş
5. Eldin J. Ehrlich
6. Elizabeth Peña
7. Dora Herrera
8. Yongwei Yang

In Language and Linguistics

1. G. Moors
2. Miloš Kankaraš
3. Deniz Canel Çınarbaş
4. Eldin J. Ehrlich
5. Elizabeth Peña
6. Dora Herrera
7. Yongwei Yang
8. J. Pérez‐González

Citations in the corpus

• A Comprehensive Method for the Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of Health Status Questionnaires (2005, methodology): “Most translation guidelines recommend the development of a final report to document the translation process, the testing process, and any changes made to the translation as a result of the testing process (Hambleton, 2001; Wild et al., in press).”
• Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Counseling Research (2008, methodology): “Assessing equivalence between the language versions of the instrument would be based only on the shared (etic) items (Hambleton, 2001).”
• The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) Factor Structure and Consistency of a French Translation (2013, background): “The culture and language particularities of the targeted population were extensively taken into account during translation (see Hambleton, 2001; and Hambleton & Patsula, 1999) to ensure the best fit to a French-speaking population.”
• Lost in translation: methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. (2007, methodology): “Linguistic equivalence typically refers to translating instructions and instruments, and checking the translation with methods such as back-translation (translation from the first language to the second, and then back to the first by a second person; Standards for Educational and Psychological Testi”
• Meta‐Analysis of Dark Side Personality Characteristics and Critical Work Behaviors among Leaders across the Globe: Findings and Implications for Leadership Development and Executive Coaching (2015, background): “Geisinger, 1994; Hambleton & Patsula, 1999; van de Vijver & Hambleton, 1996) and the International Test Commission’s Test Translation and Adaptation Guidelines (Hambleton, 2001).”
• A Cross-National Comparison of Reported Effort and Mathematics Performance in TIMSS Advanced (2014, methodology): “It was developed and adapted according to the ITC guidelines for test translation and adaptation (Hambleton, 2001), and according to TIMSS general methodology of collaborative preparation of test items among all participating countries.”
• Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II for Chinese College Students and Elite Chinese Athletes (2014, methodology): “Following the steps for the transcultural validation of psychometric instruments (Hambleton, 2001, 2005), the instrument (AAQ-II; Bond et al., 2011) was translated into Chinese by two bilingual experts through a committee approach (i.e., reaching an agreement through discussion) and then back…”
• Analysis of Cross-Cultural Comparability of PISA 2009 Scores (2014, methodology): “Second, because IRT has been the dominant approach in the field of cognitive and educational testing, DIF analysis of measurement equivalence is the usual method of choice for these types of scales (Hambleton, 2001).”
• A cross-cultural investigation of trait emotional intelligence in Hong Kong and the UK (2014, unknown): “This would minimise the effect of cultural influence on the validity of empirical findings (Hambleton, 2001), and would usually involve a sensitive analysis of the meaning equivalence of statements, in addition to basic back-translation procedures.”
• On the criterion and incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence (2007, methodology): “The questionnaire was adapted into Spanish under the direction of the second author (see Perez, 2003 ) in line with current test adaptation guidelines (Hambleton, 2001 ).”
• Evaluating Guidelines For Test Adaptations (2006, methodology): “Keywords: construct validity; cross-lingual assessment; differential item functioning; test translation; validity The Guidelines for Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests (Hambleton, 1994, 2001, 2005), developed by the International Test Commission (ITC),1 provide sage advice regarding how to”