Inequality, Institutions and Economic Growth in Latin America
By John H. Coatsworth. 2008
187 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f36d6630165521573204d8a21f5d27427f07977d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In Economics and Econometrics
- Kenneth F. Scheve
- Charlene L. Nicholls-Nixon
- Martha Rivera Pesquera
- Jose Antonio Davila Castilla
- J. S. Sánchez García
- D. Stasavage
- Florencia Torche
- J. Palma
In Political Science and International Relations
- Kenneth F. Scheve
- D. Stasavage
- Florencia Torche
- J. Palma
- Elvire Guillaud
- Ben W. Ansell
- Philipp Rehm
- Stefanie Walter
Citations in the corpus
- Homogeneous middles vs. heterogeneous tails, and the end of the ‘Inverted-U’: the share of the rich is what it's all about (2011, background): “See also Coatsworth (2008); López and Perry (2008); Sutcliffe (2001), and Williamson (1999).”
- Wealth Inequality and Democracy (2017, background): “Coatsworth (2008) also reviews several forms of evidence suggesting that wealth inequality in Latin America was no higher than in areas to the north in the colonial era.”
- Intergenerational Mobility and Inequality: The Latin American Case* (2014, background): “…to be the weakness of Latin American states that emerged after independence, which were unable to oppose particularistic interests; enforce the rule of law; and extract resources to invest in human capital, infrastructure, or public services (Centeno 2002, Centeno & Ferraro 2013, Coatsworth 2008).”
- Latin America Management Research: Review, Synthesis, and Extension (2011, background): “Researchers in the fields of history, economics, international affairs, and management suggest that there are common contextual features that have shaped the development of Latin America (Coatsworth, 2008; Harrison, 1985, 1992, 1997; Ratliff, 2006), that define it as a region (Aulakh, Kotabe, & Teeg”