The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public goods experiments
By Simon Gächter, E. Renner. 2010
359 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f2aa83af8da08c7cf15b3468569bf174d29e0eb9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Simon Gächter
- David G. Rand
- Jonathan Woon
- K. Kanthak
- E. Renner
- Urs Fischbacher
- Nicolas Treich
- Olivier Armantier
In General Decision Sciences
- Simon Gächter
- David G. Rand
- Urs Fischbacher
- Jonathan Woon
- K. Kanthak
- E. Renner
- Bernardo F. Quiroga
- Sirio Lonati
In Safety Research
- Simon Gächter
- Urs Fischbacher
- David G. Rand
- E. Renner
- Jonathan Woon
- Ernst Fehr
- K. Kanthak
- Christian Zehnder
Citations in the corpus
- Women Don't Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry (2015, methodology): “This incentive structure is used by Gächter and Renner (2010) and Croson (2000).”
- The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. (2012, background): “A solution is to add additional incentives, such that subjects are paid extra if their reported beliefs are correct (Blanco et al., 2010; Croson, 2000; G ¨ achter and Renner, 2010; Prelec, 2004).”
- A penny for your thoughts: a survey of methods for eliciting beliefs (2014, neutral): “Another tentative pattern is that the relationship between beliefs and actions is stronger when incentives are used (Trautmann and van de Kuilen, 2011; G¨achter and Renner, 2010).”
- On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations (2018, background): “…elicit not only participants’ behaviors, but also their beliefs about the behavior of other participants, incentivizing beliefs does not only increase belief accuracy, but may—depending on the situation—also distort actual behavior (Blanco, Engelmann, Koch, & Normann, 2010; Gächter & Renner, 2010).”
- Would I lie to you? On social preferences and lying aversion (2009, background): “Gachter and Renner (2006) suggest that paying subjects for accuracy may lead to more accurate reporting but not necessarily to better average predictions.”
- Eliciting beliefs: Proper scoring rules, incentives, stakes and hedging (2010, background): “11See e.g. Croson (2000), Gachter and Renner (2010), or Fischbacher and Gachter (2010).”
- Leaders as role models and ‘belief managers’ in social dilemmas (2018, methodology): “…Falk and Fischbacher (2002) , Kurzban and Houser (2005) , Muller et al. (2008) , Kocher et al. (2008) , Herrmann and Thöni (2009) , Fischbacher and Gächter (2010) , Fischbacher et al. (2012) , Thöni et al. (2012) , Volk et al. (2012) , Martinsson et al. (2013) , Kocher et al. (2015) , Cubitt et…”
- The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments (2012, background): “See Gächter and Renner (2006) for the role of incentives in public goods experiments.”