Would I lie to you? On social preferences and lying aversion
By Sjaak Hurkens, Navin Kartik. 2009
335 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7daa84367b38cdd831c9763ca045b39efe6c59b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Ö. Özer
- Yanchong Zheng
- Kay-Yut Chen
- E. Spiegelman
- Raúl López-Pérez
- Collin Raymond
- Navin Kartik
- Daniele Nosenzo
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Johannes Abeler
- E. Spiegelman
- Raúl López-Pérez
- Daniele Nosenzo
- Collin Raymond
- Ö. Özer
- Yanchong Zheng
- Kay-Yut Chen
In Safety Research
- Johannes Abeler
- E. Spiegelman
- Raúl López-Pérez
- Daniele Nosenzo
- Collin Raymond
- Ö. Özer
- Yanchong Zheng
- Kay-Yut Chen
Citations in the corpus
- Strategic Communication with Lying Costs (2009, background): “Third, recent experimental work suggests that people have an intrinsic aversion to lying, even though messages are prima facie cheap talk (Gneezy, 2005; Hurkens and Kartik, 2008; Sánchez-Pagés and Vorsatz, 2006).”
- Preferences for Truth‐Telling (2016, background): “Reporting about state of mind: Following Jiang (2013) and Greene and Paxton (2009), quite a few studies ask subjects to privately make a prediction about the outcome of a random draw.”
- Why do people tell the truth? Experimental evidence for pure lie aversion (2013, result): “Our study contributes to a burgeoning experimental literature examining deception and honesty—e.g., Gneezy (2005), Charness and Dufwenberg (2006), Vanberg (2008), Hurkens and Kartik (2009), Sutter (2009).”
- Trust in Forecast Information Sharing (2011, positive): “The existence of this psychological cost from deception is supported by extant literature (e.g., Gneezy 2005, Hurkens and Kartik 2009, Lundquist et al. 2007).”