What has action learning learned to become?

By M. Pedler, J. Burgoyne, Cheryl Brook. 2005

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f29c289676c9fdc72ffc770a712ad023b30cdf1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Toby Marshall Egan
2. Yonjoo Cho

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Toby Marshall Egan
2. Yonjoo Cho

Citations in the corpus

• Capital in the twenty-first century (2015, background): “Pedler, Burgoyne, and Brook (2005) offered a useful framework for thinking about the location of action learning based on three positions with regard to learning: Speculative – Learning for its own sake, unconcerned with application to practice and concerned with theoretical rigour.”
• Action Learning Research: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework (2009, background): “…learning practices are more often perceived to be successful when aimed toward personal growth and learning but not necessarily conducted toward organizational learning and development (De Loo, 2001, 2002, 2006; Donnenberg & De Loo, 2004; Pedler et al., 2005; Vince, 2004; Willmott, 1994).”