Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning
By Konrad Paul Kording, D. M. Wolpert. Nature, 2004
2,078 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f204c80c374772d66f28519795bd8929d0abf45a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Karl J. Friston
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Jean Daunizeau
- Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
- Tomer D. Ullman
- Samuel J. Gershman
- Klaas E. Stephan
- Wolfgang Maass
Citations in the corpus
- A computational neuroanatomy for motor control (2008, background): “Rather, our beliefs are a combination of what we predicted and what we observed (Kording and Wolpert 2004; Vaziri et al. 2006).”
- Exemplar models as a mechanism for performing Bayesian inference (2010, background): “As a consequence, probabilistic models are becoming increasingly widespread in both cognitive science and neuroscience, providing explanations of behavior in domains as diverse as motor control ( Kording & Wolpert, 2004 ), reasoning (Oaksford & Chater, 1994), memory (Anderson & Milson, 1989), and pe”
- Neurons as Monte Carlo Samplers: Bayesian Inference and Learning in Spiking Networks (2014, background): “Behavioral and neuropsychophysical experiments [2, 3, 4] have suggested that the brain may indeed maintain such a representation and employ Bayesian inference and learning in a great variety of tasks in perception, sensori-motor integration, and sensory adaptation.”
- Noise in the nervous system (2008, background): “Psychophysical experiments have confirmed that humans use these Bayesian inferences to allow them to cope with noise (and, more generally, with uncertainty) in both perception and actio”
- Motor Control is Decision-Making (2012, neutral): “initiation, the display of hand position was extinguished [29].”
- Does the brain have a baseline? Why we should be resisting a rest (2007, background): “Another suggestion for possible ‘intrinsic’ functionality of the brain was made recently by Raichle and Gusnard, in a reference to the literature on predictive coding and ‘top-down’ computational mechanisms in the brain (see e.g. Kording and Wolpert, 2004).”
- The Hamiltonian Brain: Efficient Probabilistic Inference with Excitatory-Inhibitory Neural Circuit Dynamics (2014, background): “Human behaviour is consistent with Bayesian inference in many sensory [1, 2, 3, 4], motor [5, 6] and cognitive [7, 8, 9] tasks.”
- Free-energy and the brain (2007, background): “…machine that conforms to the same principles that govern the interrogation of scientific data (MacKay, 1956; Neisser, 1967; Ballard et al, 1983; Mumford, 1992; Kawato et al 1993; Rao and Ballard 1998; Dayan et al, 1995; Friston, 2003; Körding and Wolpert 2004; Kersten et al 2004; Friston 2005).”
- Attention, Uncertainty, and Free-Energy (2010, background): “…of many accounts that emphasize the role of probabilistic inference in sensory processing; including sensorimotor integration (Wolpert et al., 1995; Körding and Wolpert, 2004), sensory integration (Jacobs, 1999; Ernst and Banks, 2002; Knill and Saunders, 2003; Alais and Burr, 2004), salience and…”
- Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty (2008, background): “At the lower levels of processing, some human capabilities apparently involve calculations that seem surprisingly diffi cult (e.g., Bayesian estimation in a sensorimotor context: Körding & Wolpert, 2004).”
- Neural Dynamics as Sampling: A Model for Stochastic Computation in Recurrent Networks of Spiking Neurons (2011, background): “Therefore many researchers have suggested that information processing in the brain carries out probabilistic, rather than logical, inference for making decisions and choosing actions [9–22].”