The Hamiltonian Brain: Efficient Probabilistic Inference with Excitatory-Inhibitory Neural Circuit Dynamics

By Laurence Aitchison, Máté Lengyel. 2014

74 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Probabilistic inference offers a principled framework for understanding both behaviour and cortical computation. However, two basic and ubiquitous properties of cortical responses seem difficult to reconcile with probabilistic inference: neural activity displays prominent oscillations in response to constant input, and large transient changes in response to stimulus onset. Indeed, cortical models of probabilistic inference have typically either concentrated on tuning curve or receptive field properties and remained agnostic as to the underlying circuit dynamics, or had simplistic dynamics that gave neither oscillations nor transients. Here we show that these dynamical behaviours may in fact be understood as hallmarks of the specific representation and algorithm that the cortex employs to perform probabilistic inference. We demonstrate that a particular family of probabilistic inference algorithms, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), naturally maps onto the dynamics of excitatory-inhibitory neural networks. Specifically, we constructed a model of an excitatory-inhibitory circuit in primary visual cortex that performed HMC inference, and thus inherently gave rise to oscillations and transients. These oscillations were not mere epiphenomena but served an important functional role: speeding up inference by rapidly spanning a large volume of state space. Inference thus became an order of magnitude more efficient than in a non-oscillatory variant of the model. In addition, the network matched two specific properties of observed neural dynamics that would otherwise be difficult to account for using probabilistic inference. First, the frequency of oscillations as well as the magnitude of transients increased with the contrast of the image stimulus. Second, excitation and inhibition were balanced, and inhibition lagged excitation. These results suggest a new functional role for the separation of cortical populations into excitatory and inhibitory neurons, and for the neural oscillations that emerge in such excitatory-inhibitory networks: enhancing the efficiency of cortical computations.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods, Neuroscience

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods

In Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

What can the brain teach us about building artificial intelligence? (2016, methodology): “Today, Anderson’s ACT-R perhaps provides the most comprehensive simulation model (Anderson et al. 2004). A second road was taken by pioneers like Colby (1975) with PARRY, a computer program simulating a paranoid, Abelson and Carroll (1965) with their True Believer program, andWeizenbaum (1966) with ”
Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018, background): “As theories of brain computation, approximate inference algorithms like sampling may explain cortical feedback signals and activity correlations.(144,164,165,166,167) Moreover, the corners cut by the brain for computational efficiency, the approximations, may explain human deviations from statistica”